This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Active Euthanasia Essay

641 words - 3 pages

Active Euthanasia

Active euthanasia is the act of killing of a living person in attempts to stop

the suffering on someone's behalf. Active euthanasia should remain illegal because of the

immorality of the acts. In looking at the definition, that will be enough to prove that

active euthanasia should not be accepted in our society.

In the first part of the definition, active euthanasia is the killing of a living person.

Despite any circumstances, a living person has the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of

happiness. By taking away the life of a living person, it takes away from the natural rights

bestowed upon us by being American citizens living under the Declaration of Independence.

If one's life is taken away from them, then they no longer have that right to life and have

therefore their rights to liberty and the pursuit of ...view middle of the document...

If people were able to just deem themselves unworthy to live in our society

and find their lives meaningless, then we as a society should help them feel more important and

loved then to use the alternative of just killing the person. Arthur J. Dyke says this best when

he discusses suffering as a normal part of the cycle of birth and death. "Suffering people need

the support of others; suffering people should not be encouraged to commit suicide by their

community, or that community ceases to be a community." People should never feel worthless, and

it is morally wrong for the people around them to let them continue to feel this way and encourage

the ending of their lives.

Doctors take an oath at the conclusion of medical school to not do any harm to their patients,

and instead, their purpose is to help those who are suffering. Active euthanasia not only allows,

but also encourages, doctors to go against this oath and harm their patients in the worst possible

way, death. It seems to give the doctor the power to play God instead of forcing them to do their

job and help preserve the patient's life for as a long as possible.

Dying with dignity is an interesting concept that can be looked at in various ways.

If someone is hooked up to a machine whose life is based solely on the use of that machine,

then many see this as not being able to die with dignity. Even those who believe this fact

though cannot successfully argue that taking one's life directly through the means of an

injection or another form of active euthanasia would be considered dying with dignity. If a

person gives into the temptation of choosing death over the pain they are suffering, then this

person cannot truly die with dignity. Dignity is when you face problems and do everything you can

to face them, and taking the easy way out by killing this person, is suicide and/or murder,

considering the circumstances. Both of those acts are immoral and illegal in our society, and

therefore active euthanasia is immoral and should not be legalized.

Other Essays Like Active Euthanasia

Euthanasia and Religon Essay

2362 words - 10 pages has evolved into death that is free of anxiety and pain, usually constituting the use of medication. Primarily euthanasia is used to end one’s life in order to keep them from suffering. There are two types of euthanasia, active and passive. Passive euthanasia is avoiding great measures to extend life when death is upon a victim because of an incurable or terminal illness. It is not to speed up death but to avoid long, extended pain and

Euthanasia Is The Right To Kill

821 words - 4 pages solution to pain is better educating health care professionals, not taking somebody’s life. In the Unites States, “active euthanasia,” killing a person who is awake and able to make decisions, remains to be a serious crime, punishable by life imprisonment, while “passive euthanasia,” disconnecting any mechanical respirators that are keeping a comatose patient alive, may be conducted in over thirty states. Problems continue to rise between doctors

Physcian Assisted Suicide

505 words - 3 pages physician assisted suicide and euthanasia, passive or active, is ongoing. The traditional view of J. Gay-Williams and Phillippa Foot, who make the clear distinction between active and passive euthanasia, is morally irrelevant. What is the difference between letting someone die by withholding medication or giving pain medication to pacify until natural death occurs and giving a terminally ill patient the opportunity to inject a lethal dose of

Euthanasia And Frankenstein

1533 words - 7 pages the death of someone to end their pain and suffering oftentimes in cases of terminal illness. Some people call this “mercy killings.” There are two types of euthanasia: passive and active. Passive or voluntary euthanasia refers to withholding life saving treatments or medical technology to prolong life. For example, a patient has the right to refuse medical treatment. They also have the right to refuse resuscitation if they are in need to

Euthanasia: The Right To Die

1686 words - 7 pages topic hinge on the health and mental state of the victim as well as method of death. It raises legal issues as well as the issue of morals and ethics. Euthanasia is divided into two different categories, passive euthanasia and active euthanasia. “There are unavoidable uncertainties in both active and passive euthanasia. Doctors may disagree over a prognosis. A patient may be so depressed by pain that one day he wants out, while the next day, with


2617 words - 11 pages the law and accept voluntary euthanasia, we will not be able to keep it under control. Voluntary euthanasia will make it easier to commit murder, since the perpetrators can disguise it as active voluntary euthanasia. Finally, euthanasia should remain illegal because it is not always in the patients' best interest. A serious dilemma foreseen regarding legalizing euthanasia, are the number of cases in which a patient may ask to be euthanized, or feel

Facts and Ethics Behind Euthanasia

2215 words - 9 pages should not even exist. Euthanasia is defined as "the action of killing..." James Rachels states in his "Active and Passive Euthanasia" that "The important difference between active and passive euthanasia is that in passive euthanasia, the doctor does not do anything to bring about the patient's death. The doctor does nothing and the patient dies of whatever ills already afflict him. In active euthanasia, however, the doctor does

Euthanasia - to Live and Let Die

3538 words - 15 pages Hippocratic Oath. However, as a practical matter, physicians have had a measure of latitude in the specific application. For example, a fatal dose of an opium based drug might be administered to counteract intractable pain in a terminal patient, with an expected resulting death. Unlike euthanasia, PAS involves the physician as a facilitator of patient termination, one in which the patient still participates, in a limited fashion, as an active


1669 words - 7 pages have the legal freedom to help these people to accomplish it. I feel very strongly that voluntary active euthanasia should be legal in our country as well as all other countries. “Voluntary active euthanasia is a well-established practice in The Netherlands. One of the interesting aspects of the Dutch system is its requirement that active euthanasia be available only if the patient is experiencing unbearable suffering (with no prospect of

Legalizing Euthanasia For Terminally Ill Patients Is Neccesary

1537 words - 7 pages patient as comfortable as possible. Sometimes, the most comfortable thing that can be done for a patient is to let them to stop holding on to an unrealistic hope of recovery and allow them to die with little pain and dignity. Whether doctors give terminally ill patients a lethal dose of drugs, active euthanasia, or simply refuse necessary medical treatments, passive euthanasia, it is not murder because the patient is not truly alive (Barnard). A


891 words - 4 pages believe that Euthanasia is justified depending on the situation. However, many are strongly against it, and believe that it is completely up to God to determine when to end someone's life. Yet, others believe that after a certain timeframe there is no hope and in order to end suffering of a loved one you need to end their life in peace.Now, there are two types of Euthanasia: The first is known as Active Euthanasia and refers to the direct killing

Related Papers

Is Euthanasia Ever Morally Acceptable? Essay

1757 words - 8 pages ) Active Euthanasia: deliberate killing 2) Passive Euthanasia: allowing to die (non-intervention) 3) Voluntary Euthanasia: requested death and 4) Non-Voluntary Euthanasia: not requested." (5)Let's compare Active Euthanasia and Passive Euthanasia. Is one of the euthanasia morally worse than the other? Active euthanasia is when you actually do the action to bring about death to the patient (killing). Passive euthanasia is when the patient

If Human Life Has Intrinsic Value Is Euthanasia Always Immoral?

1806 words - 8 pages . Active euthanasia implies some active step, for example the giving of a drug, has been taken to cause the death of a sufferer. Passive euthanasia means no active treatment is given, rather treatment is withheld. Because it arouses questions about the morality of killing, the effectiveness of consent, and the duties of physicians, and equity in the distribution of resources, euthanasia is one of the most acute and uncomfortable contemporary problems

The Ethics Of Euthanasia Essay

604 words - 3 pages Euthanasia, also mercy killing, practice of ending a life so as to release an individual from an incurable disease or intolerable suffering. The term is sometimes used generally to refer to an easy or painless death. Voluntary euthanasia involves a request by the dying patient or that person's legal representative. Passive or negative euthanasia involves not doing something to prevent death--that is, allowing someone to die; active or positive

Voluntary Euthanasia Paper 1

1004 words - 5 pages man was miserable as he was a very active person and his treatment was not working for him so he had himself killed by means of voluntary euthanasia. This form of euthanasia is the individual’s choice and therefore it should be legal as they are physically unable to do so. The second reason I disagree is because the patient may not be able to communicate to ask for this form of mercy to be given to them. Non voluntary euthanasia is another