Animal Testing Should Be Reduced Essay

783 words - 4 pages

     The common belief is that animal testing has accelerated science and medicine a great deal, but the truth is simple: animal experimentation has not cured a single disease. People have been misled into believing that animal experimentation is responsible for many “miracle cures” and “medical breakthroughs” for decades. The reason is very straightforward: animals differ from humans greatly—too much to be able to have accurate results from experiments. The only progress with infectious disease made in the 20th century was made through improved nutrition, hygiene, and public sanitation. This is not a result of animal research. In response, many ask this question: ...view middle of the document...

Surely there are some humans who cannot think or reason; yet, these people are treated in a special way.
     Animals are constantly being tortured while scientists and test conductors claim that the animals are not in pain and given painkillers. However, this is not true. Most tests do cause pain. If you think about it, how can tests trying to see if make-up irritates the eye, not be painful? In addition, these animals are not given anesthetics prior to tests nor any painkillers administered to ease the pain afterward in fear that these drugs may cause inaccurate results in tests. On the other hand, it may be because drugs such as aspirin or anesthetics do not work on the animal that is being tested on. For example, aspirin kills cats. There is an endless amount of examples like the one stated above. A secretly filmed video of Procter & Gamble (P&G) shows things like the following: 48 monkeys killed to test nasal decongestant which is already in use by humans; 28 female cats had their abdomens cut open and solution injected repeatedly into their bowels; 24 young dogs were given kidney failure by the removal of one kidney and damaging the other. All the dogs were killed after being fed an experimental diet...

Other Essays Like Animal Testing Should Be Reduced

Animal Testing Essay

1487 words - 6 pages the results going to be the same? Most importantly, should we ban animal testing for the sake of the animals? Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what is involved. Whether it is called animal testing, animal experimentation or animal research, it refers to the experimentation carried out on animals. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of everything from medication to

Alternative To Animal Testing Essay

1158 words - 5 pages Alternatives to Animal Testing Animal testing has become a controversial issue among many people in the world today. Some of these people involved in this controversial debate believe that animal testing is unethical and should be replaced by other methods. The other group of people in this debate believe that animal testing is necessary in order to research new products that cannot be tested on humans. Traditional animal testing forces animals

The Pros and Cons of Animal Testing

1494 words - 6 pages and their rights. The torture of animals used in experiments must be stopped and made illegal by the government. Animals are living creatures as well as us humans and they should not be tortured. We can help save animals from suffering and death by demanding the use of non- animal testing by corporations and the government. References Animal cruelty facts.(2011). Retrieved from Animal experimentation

Animal Testing

1442 words - 6 pages to animal experimentation, and they are addressed by some government websites. The number of animals used for experimentation tens of millions. Scientists defend animal research saying that this testing has contributed greatly to the advancement of cures for human diseases. However, in our generation, there should be a continued resolve in the fight against animal experimentation because it is morally wrong, there are now promising alternatives

Cosmetic Testing on Animals

549 words - 3 pages animals anywhere in the world. The EU is alone in this venture however, the leading animal testing nations which include the United States, Canada, Brazil, and China all continue to test on animals.  Animals should not be made to suffer so that humans may look better. The practice of animal testing is cruel, inhumane, and barbaric, and may even be of any use. To stop this tragedy, people should avoid buying products made by companies that use

Australians Do Not Do Enough to Stop Animal Cruelty Internationally

1348 words - 6 pages against violence making animals among the most exploited, and in need of our protection. It us up to us to be their voice. The only thing we are doing is right now is just talking about it. We do have some campaigns for example Animal Australia but this practises are just not enough to stop this nationally before we even think about spreading this word out internationally. Fighting animal testing should be more than a slogan; it needs to be a

Aniamal Experiments Should Be Prohibited

1220 words - 5 pages order to achieve that, they have to use several methods, and animal experimentation is one of those. Some people think that, animal experiments give people a lot of benefits. I agree with this opinion, but I think it’s only true in the past because these days, thanks to the development of technology in medicine, animal experiments is now not necessary and should be prohibited for the following reasons. The first reason I object to animal testing is

Arguement Against Testing on Animals

1558 words - 7 pages Arguments Against Animal Testing There are no real alternatives to animal experimentation, as alternatives are those options that arise in order to replace something of somewhat the same worth, and there is nothing else in the world that is quite as useless, harmful and misleading as animal experimentation. This is why animal rights activists all over the world should start declining medicines that have been tested on animals. [pic] "I have

Animal testing

562 words - 3 pages both sides seem reasonable, prohibiting animal testing should be justified, and that is what I want to do.To begin with, animal experimenting is ineffective. Animals and humans have a lot of uncommon characteristics. According to the survey, animal and humans have only 1.16percent of things in common. In other words, humans can confront with diseases by some elements which were un-harmful to animals. That right there clarifies that animal

A New Look At An Old Argument: Animal Rights

2345 words - 10 pages using animals. However, the studies they cite were often performed by the very laboratories that profit from animal testing. This data should be taken with a grain of salt until everything can be verified or disproved by sources that are more objective (Regan 1). In addition, there have been many cases where animal testing has yielded results that were later found to be in conflict with actual human reactions. For years, animal experiments on rats

The Controversial Issue Of Animal Ethics

2703 words - 11 pages reduced in the in the past 22 years. This could be due to the new laws and regulations that are constantly being passed, or to the onset of alternatives. Source: Scientific American. The Numbers of Research Animals. http.// (16, Feb. 2000). As stated many times, animal experimentation has led to great advances in medicine, but there are other ways to make great leaps in medicine then testing these

Related Papers

Persuasive Essay On Why Thereputic Cloning And Endangered Animal Cloning Should Be Allowed?

672 words - 3 pages , reproductive cloning should be allowed if they can copy some one?s mind. In addition, many religious leaders said cloning is against the will of God, but I ask you who decides the will of God. What if God wants us to clone people now and save billons of people in the future? Organ cloning (aka. therapeutic cloning) and cloning of endangered animals should be allowed by law, but reproductive cloning of humans should not be allowed.Reproductive cloning

Don't Trust The Labels: Be An Informed Consumer Uses The Argument That Nutritional Supplements Should Undergo Testing By The Fda, Like Any Other Drug, Before They Are Put On The Market

5753 words - 24 pages crying uncontrollably."(1A)Why should the public be concerned about taking nutritional supplements? Because we are not given all of the facts. The FDA requires prescription drugs to be scientifically tested for safety and effectiveness before they are put on the market. No such rules exist for dietary supplements. There is no quality control. Amanda Spakepoints to recent findings:The University of Arkansas College of Pharmacy studying the labels

Animal Testing Speech

1004 words - 5 pages Animal Testing I. Speech Overview: Slide 1 A. General Purpose: To inform B. Specific Purpose: By the end of my speech, my audience will be able to know the history about animal testing and the pros and cons about it. C. Thesis Statement: I’m going to talk about the history of animal testing, its pros, and its cons. II. Introduction: D. Attention Getting Device: An estimated 26 million animals are used

Animal Testing Essay

561 words - 3 pages be such a way to protect human. This means that human harm is reduced and human lives are saved from the danger of drug. Furthermore, many people might believe that animal testing is only useful to humans, but what many do not know is that animal testing also helps animals in various ways. Animals share the same diseases as humans like cancer, high blood pressure, and other common diseases. Animals need the same medications as humans do. Cancer