This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Apple V. Samsung: Adding Elements To Avoid Infringement

941 words - 4 pages

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., — F.3d —, 2012 WL 4820601, App. No. 2012-1507 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (N.D.Ill. 12-CV-0630) (APPLE II)

This is my second post on the appellate decision that I term Apple II. [Read the First Apple II Post.] In Apple II, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated N.D. California District Court Judge Koh’s preliminary injunction order that would have forced Samsung’s Galaxy Nexus smartphone off the market pending conclusion of the infringement lawsuit. The appellate court provided two independent reasons for vacating the preliminary injunction order: (1) that Apple had failed to provide proof of irreparable harm due to Samsung’s continued use ...view middle of the document...

We all use heuristics for searching. For example, if you want to find prior art relating to a chemical compound, you might hire an expert chemistry searcher. On the other hand, if your search area is airplane seat design, you might hire someone else. Under the language of the patent, these search strategies could be defined as two different heuristic modules each corresponding to their respective search area. In the lawsuit itself, Apple identified the three heuristic modules as (1) a Google Search Module; (2) a Module that allows for Search of Internet Browsing History; and (3) a Search of a user’s Contacts List. One difficulty with considering this case is that this invention appears in hindsight to be ridiculously obvious. However, obviousness is not the topic of the appeal.

The patent claim requires “a plurality of heuristic modules … wherein: each heuristic module corresponds to a respective area of search and employs a different, predetermined heuristic algorithm corresponding to said respective area.” Samsung’s product allegedly uses a plurality of heuristic modules corresponding to different search areas. However, the accused product does not use “different, predetermined heuristic algorithm” for each and every different search area. I have modeled this below with a diagram of the Galaxy Nexus Search System associated with five different Search Areas (A,B,C,D,E) but only three different Heuristic Modules (X,Y,Z). Although some of the Heuristic Modules are re-used by the system, Apple argues that the system still infringes under standard patent law that would find the addition of non-infringing elements to an infringing core does not negate infringement. See CIAS, Inc. v. Alliance Gaming Corp., 504 F.3d 1356, 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (infringing device may include additional, unrecited elements).

Writing for the unanimous panel, Judge Prost (joined by Judge Moore and Reyna)...

Other Essays Like Apple V. Samsung: Adding Elements to Avoid Infringement

Principles of Organisation Behavior Essay

1424 words - 6 pages , May 14). Samsung promises to compensate factory workers who suffered cancer. Retrieved October 27, 2014, from The Guardian: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/14/samsung-compensate-factory-workers-cancer   Ba, S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243-268.   Brien, M. (2014, March 1). Samsung versus Apple

How Apple Add's Value to Its Stakeholders

4931 words - 20 pages represent the gold standard for selling, the reasons why Apple are so successful is a ‘mystery to many’. He goes on to suggest elements such as the useable friendly products, great customer experience, great customer service or even the ability to touch the products. These are all methods of creating added value to generate customer loyalty. (Ribeiro, et al., 2014) defines added value as “Products and price based transactions become supplemented

Apple Swot Analysis

2673 words - 11 pages amount to its operating cost. Patent infringement Along with Apple’s growth, legal complaints related to its patent infringement increases over time. At the end of 2009, the company was defending more than 47 patent infringement cases, of which 27 cases were filled in 2009. Nokia filed an action against Apple in 2009, alleging the infringement of the GSM, UMT and wireless communication standards. Beside that, Motorola alone filed three

Tangible Law

1479 words - 6 pages Report, 2009, p. 11). 3. Research reveals several legal proceedings that involve Apple. The company is “vigorously defending more than 47 patent infringement cases, 27 of which were filed during fiscal 2009” (Apple Inc. Annual Report, 2009, p. 17). Some of which include the following: ▪ Harvey v. Apple Inc. Plaintiff alleged infringement of US patent entitled “Recharger for use with a portable electronic device and which includes

Standard Essential Patents

3960 words - 16 pages their alleged infringement of a SEP covering technology which was used to implement 4G LTE standard.ZTE claimed that Huawei abused its dominant position since ZTE was willing to negotiate a licensing agreement to use the patent By relying on Article 102 of European directive “The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union”. The case is still in its early stages and is awaiting judgement . The fight between Samsung and apple also brought

Samsung Management

1822 words - 8 pages this paper work. In the following sections, we will apply the Principles of Management and use Samsung Electronic’s company as a figure to explain and clarify the requirements of this assignment. We surely know that Samsung is a good case to drive us toward to the achievement of this assignment. Once again, keep in mind that we use Samsung to imply the phrase Samsung Electronics company for convenience. 2. CHALLENGES AND

Business Analysis Part I

1829 words - 8 pages efficiently. Supplier agreements with Apple are very strict and sometimes lead to disagreements (Yang, 2011). The company’s largest supplier, Samsung, has recently undergone legal battles with Apple. In an effort to meet the needs of its supplier, Apple must be sensitive to these types of situations and should approach the issue with care. Apple must consider if it is the right decision to sue a major supplier. Based on the extensive research, Apple

Customer Relationship Management

2221 words - 9 pages Product leadership Samsung and Apple Samsung has been searching for an answer for the hugely popular iPhone since the smartphone-boom exploded in 2007 with the launch of the first iPhone. The answer came in the form of the OS Android. Samsung decided to walk hand-in-hand with google and released the first galaxy s phone in 2010, to compete against the industry giant, Apple. Since then, the industry has matured. And Samsung, from having a small

Newsletter

3529 words - 15 pages Appeal in the UK, Must Run Apology Ads Apple and Samsung have been tied up in a UK court for quite some time following Apple's allegations that Samsung infringed on its patents with the design of the Galaxy Tab. Apple may have won a massive jury verdict against Samsung in the United States after Samsung was found to have infringed on patents having to do with smartphones, but the same can't be said about tablets in the UK. The judge presiding

Manufactured Goods in Korea

519 words - 3 pages . In 2012, it overtook longtime leader Nokia to become the No. 1 player in cellphones, with 29% market share worldwide. In smartphones, those high-end devices with advanced computing power, Samsung is also No. 1 globally and in a dead heat with Apple in the U.S.: In the weeks following the launce of Apple’s iphone 5, Samsung sold a record-breaking no. of its own sig. smartphone, the Galaxy SIII. Most analysts show Apple with a slight edge in

Strategic Management

733 words - 3 pages alliance: Sharp is one of the manufacturers that helps make the displays that Apple uses in some of their iOS products, although it seems that the Japanese company will be forming some sort of close alliance/partnership with Samsung in hopes that the South Korean company will be able to pull them out of their financial slump. According to Reuters, Sharp will be entering a three-year rehabilitation program in hopes of recovering financially

Related Papers

Samsung Initiative Essay

1947 words - 8 pages company needs to vigorously defend against copycats. However, since Samsung’s patents are highly sophisticated, it is unlikely that small businesses will be able to make use of Samsung’s patents. In fact, Samsung has recently been in a heated legal battle with another powerful multinational company, Apple, as a result of alleged patent infringement by Apple. The lawsuits do not go into the specifics of the patents. However, Samsung accuses Apple of

Strategic Management Of Apple Inc. And Samsung Group

2757 words - 12 pages compete with Android devices, cloud service development and reputation due to patent infringement case. The threats that would affect Apple are Android operating system growth, competitors, new entries, patent infringement by another company and high prices. A SWOT analysis for Samsung Group would include low costs in products and production, capital, low consumer pricing, brand reputation and engineering technology success are all strengths for

Intellectual Property Essay

751 words - 4 pages , 2011). A few days later Samsung fires back at Apple Inc. with an infringement lawsuit themselves, claiming that Apple Inc. infringing 10 patents. It was not long before Apple Inc. began winning the countersuits against them, causing Samsung product to be pull from the shelves (Parish, 2012). The lawsuits between the two electronic companies where taking place all over the world. The claims became bigger over time between Apple Inc. and Samsung

I M Kavya Essay

769 words - 4 pages  was the first of a series of ongoing lawsuits between Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics regarding the design of smartphones and tablet computers; between them, the companies made more than half of smartphones sold worldwide as of July 2012.[1] In the spring of 2011, Apple began litigating against Samsung in patent infringement suits, while Apple and Motorola Mobility were already engaged in a patent waron several fronts.[2] Apple's