Between 1953 61 Us Soviet Relations Were Based On Confrontation Rather Than Co Existence. How Far Do You Agree With This View?

1666 words - 7 pages

The period of 1953-1961 is widely considered to be one of a thaw in Cold War tensions between the two global superpowers of the USA and USSR. The death of Josef Stalin in 1953 and the election of Dwight Eisenhower – serving two terms in this period - brought a change in leadership in both nations and with that, an inevitable change in policies. Confrontation in this period did not necessarily only apply to direct military intervention, with both sides talking pugnaciously towards one another, making grand threats to the other’s safety. It could also be argued however that this was a period of co-existence with both nations respecting the other's sphere of influence, shown in both the US ...view middle of the document...

The U2 crisis of 1960 suddenly threw espionage into the global public eye. Gary Powers' flight was shot down over the Soviet Union, showing signs of confrontation from both superpowers; the USA for clearly attempting to gain intelligence on the USSR and the Soviets for their reaction in shooting down the plane. When Kennedy was elected in 1961, he too was seen to be staunchly anti-Communist. The Berlin Crisis of 1961 was Kennedy's first experience of utilizing foreign policy and his response to the USSR could have been seen as somewhat confrontational. When the Berlin Wall was constructed, Kennedy sent tanks and bulldozers to the border. This was a particularly confrontational manoevre, very much leaving the Soviets with the next move which could certainly have been an attack on these tanks. It is therefore clear to see that in this period the USA were still particularly confrontational. The methods in which these confrontations were shown changed however, mostly to espionage and the tough talking of Eisenhower and Dulles.
However, to a certain extent, the 'New Look' policy served to aid co-existence between the two superpowers in this period. Firstly, due to his background as an army general in the Second World War, Eisenhower was aware of the damage that nuclear weapons could do, suggesting that his policy of massive retaliation would be unlikely to occur, due to the destruction it could cause. Eisenhower was not prepared to use nuclear weapons due to their destruction, suggesting neither superpower was prepared to use nuclear weapons. The US reaction towards the Hungarian Uprising of 1956 was one of co-existence, choosing not to interfere with a nation which was deeply rooted within the Soviet sphere of influence. Evidently there is a great chance that this was for self preservation, but by respecting such boundaries the US forces were opting for a co-existent policy on this particular matter. Eisenhower also greatly reduced military spending on conventional weaponry which appeared to be a co-existent move. More funding was put towards nuclear weapons which could potentially seem confrontational, but due to mutual deterrence (the reluctance to go nuclear in fear of the enemy's capability), funding of nuclear weapons could be seen to be a less confrontational move than direct military funding. In addition, U-2 spy planes had ensured that Eisenhower was aware of the Soviet Unions nuclear capability. He was therefore confident that the US was superior and so was more prepared to negotiate with the USSR knowing that he was in a position of strength. This consequently led to co-existence because he no longer needed to assert his authority of the Soviets. Moreover, the presidency of Kennedy also helped encourage co-existence. Kennedy’s ‘Flexible Response’ offered a more diverse approach to communism and the USSR, moving away from the basis on nuclear weapons to a wider range of options. This move from an emphasis on nuclear weapons can be seen to...

Other Essays Like Between 1953-61 Us-Soviet Relations Were Based on Confrontation Rather Than Co-Existence. How Far Do You Agree with This View?

“Referendums Are Beneficial to Democracy” to What Extent Do You Agree with This View?

904 words - 4 pages   “Referendums are beneficial to democracy” to what extent do you agree with this view? Referendum is a public vote on legislature. It is a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ on specific issues affecting a state. It is the most direct form of democracy. Referendums become a popular mechanism for making decisions under the ‘Blair’ administration. In a referendum, the government asks members of the public to help decide on an important issue. Everyone of voting

How Far Do You Agree That Hitler's Policies Were A Success For German People During The 1930s?

886 words - 4 pages opposition to prevent them from influencing others. Fear of being sent to concentration camps or of being denounced by the SS or Gestapo kept silent many of those who did not support the Nazis.Hence, I agree to a large extent that his policies were successful. With the success of the four year plan, inflation slowed, people could feel secure about saving again, unemployment decreased to 0.5 million in 1938 and wages rose. Hence, this is the most

The Main Threat to the Weimar Republic in the Period 1919-23 Was the Extreme Right" How Far Do You Agree with This Judgement?

1005 words - 5 pages The main threat to the Weimar Republic in the period 1919-23 was the extreme right" How far do you agree with this judgement? The Weimar Republic was created at a time of confusion and chaos after Germany had lost the First World War. Many people felt that Germany had received a very harsh deal in the Treaty of Versailles and they resented the government for signing it and agreeing to its conditions. In the period 1919-23 there were threats to

‘of Mice and Men’ Serves as a Reminder That Dreaming Is Futile. How Far Do You Agree with This Representation of the Text and Its Key Themes?

1562 words - 7 pages ‘Of Mice and Men’ serves as a reminder that dreaming is futile. How far do you agree with this representation of the text and its key themes? To first answer the question we need to define a key element, what are dreams? When we dream we contemplate the possibility of doing something or indulging in fantasies about something greatly desired. Yet they are necessary to keep the levels of hope high in people to stand for what they believe in

How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Origins of the Cold War in 1945 and 1946 Owed Much to Ideological Differences and Little to Personalities and Conflicting National Interests

1045 words - 5 pages How far do you agree with the view that the origins of the Cold War in 1945 and 1946 owed much to ideological differences and little to personalities and conflicting national interests? (TOTAL 40 MARKS) Use sources 7 and 8 to your own knowledge The origins of the Cold War in 1945 and 1946 were due to a number of factors, and whether it was mainly due to ideological differences or personalities and conflicting national interests is still a

How Far Do You Agree That the Actions of the Ussr Were Primarily Responsible for the Division of Germany in 1949?

609 words - 3 pages How far do you agree that the actions of the USSR were primarily responsible for the division of Germany in 1949? Actions of the USSR contributing towards division Stalin’s determination to create a buffer zone and attitude towards Germany * Stalin wanted to protect the USSR from future conflicts with Germany * Stalin had gained influence in many eastern European countries as the Russian armies advanced for Germany. * Stalin’s

How Far Do You Agree That William Duke of Normandy’s Military Skills Were the Main Reason for His Success in Securing the English Throne in 1066?

909 words - 4 pages William of Normandy’s father died whilst he was only young leaving William as the Duke of Normandy at the age of 7. This meant William started training in warfare very young, quickly gathering experience and knowledge of how to plan a battle and then what tactics were best for different scenarios. This experienced that was gained at such a young age meant that William had many years of experience in warfare which helped him prepare for the

Use Source T, U and V and Your Own Knowledge. Do You Agree with the View in Source V That Wolsey's Domestic Policis Were Disappointing?

1456 words - 6 pages Use source T, U and V and your own knowledge. Do you accept the view in source V that Wolsey’s domestic policies were disappointing? Thomas Wolsey was Henry VIII chief minister from his rise to power in 1514 after working himself up until his eventual fall from the king’s favour in 1529. During the time period where Wolsey contained his power he made many changes to England’s domestic policies. For this reason I do not accept the view of

Technology Is the Best Way to Reduce the Impact of an Earthquake - to What Extent Do You Agree with This View

1136 words - 5 pages ‘Technology is the best way to reduce the impact of an earthquake’ to what extent do you agree with this view? (40 marks) An earthquake is a sudden violent shaking of the ground, typically causing great destruction, as a result of movements within the earth’s crust or volcanic action. Impacts of an earthquake can include short-term impacts such as fatalities, or long-term impacts such as income lost through lack of tourism. Technology can be

How Far Do You Agree That the Most Important Cause of the Revolution in February 1917 Was the Great War

1334 words - 6 pages AS History How far do you agree that the most important cause of the revolution in February 1917 was the Great War? The February revolution which occurred in 1917 was the result of several causes, one of which being World War 1; in my opinion, it was the most important trigger. The Great War was the cause of Russia becoming financially dependent on Britain and France, decreasing the prestige the Tsar once held. Russia was unable to sustain its

How Far Do You Agree That the Catholic Church Significantly Hindered Italian Unity in the Years to 1870?

821 words - 4 pages How far do you agree that the Catholic Church significantly hindered Italian unity in the years to 1870? The Catholic Church was a major power in Italy during the time of unification. Some people say that they hindered the process of Italian Unity and some say they didn’t. In this essay I will be explain points which back up and go against the statement that the church significantly hindered the process of Italian unity. To a very far extent

Related Papers

How Far Do You Agree That Shakespeare’s Portrayal Of Gender Relations Is More Sinister Than Comic?

1668 words - 7 pages  How far do you agree that Shakespeare’s portrayal of gender relations is more sinister than comic? Shakespeare’s depiction of gender relations in ‘Much Ado About Nothing’ distinguishes male and female stereotypes during the Elizabethan era of 1599. Shakespeare accomplishes this through the contrasting couples of Benedick and Beatrice and Hero and Claudio. The relationship between

‘The Novel’s Contrasting Settings Portray A Gulf Between Social Classes In Victorian Society.’ How Far And In What Ways Do You Agree With This View Of The Picture Of Dorian Gray?

1010 words - 5 pages ‘The novel’s contrasting settings portray a gulf between social classes in Victorian society.’ How far and in what ways do you agree with this view of The Picture of Dorian Gray? The novel’s contrasting settings do portray a gulf between social classes in Victorian society but also represents the dualism in The Picture Of Dorian Gray. Wilde specifically chooses to pick two opposite settings, the East End and the West End, and ignores the

“The Women Characters Are Merely Decorative Figures Of Seemingly Fragile Beauty” – How Far And In What Ways Do You Agree With This View Of The Great Gatsby

1336 words - 6 pages in this way. For example Nick describes Jordan as “incurably dishonest”. This introduces the ideology of distrust of women in the novel. In the 1920s men and women weren’t equal. Men could do as they liked but women were stuck doing what the man wanted. For example men could get a divorce and people would support them and blame the woman. On the other hand if a woman wanted a divorce it would be shameful. Myrtle is Toms ‘other woman’. She is

“The Puritans Were Never A Serious Threat To Elizabeth” How Far Do You Agree?

1148 words - 5 pages .” Her nervous and rather annoyed tone indicates her panic. She is writing in urgency that this needs to be repressed now. From this letter we can gather that Elizabeth thought the situation was under control but now the Puritans seem to be causing her grief and worry. They indeed were posing a threat. Conversely, G. R. Elton argues that “England was far from puritan, but it was becoming more definitely protestant, and in this movement the