Church Growth Research Graph and Statistics
Identify the goal, population, and type of study
The goal of this study is to determine what constitutes healthy growth or failure in a church. Of the 2180000000 churches around the world 1103 were used in this particular study which amounts to 0.000050596330275229354 % of the total available pool which included all faiths. These churches were of different denominations. This is a cross sectional analysis of how different churches grow or fail. For this study churches were selected from a previous study that was conducted from other research. These churches that were included in the study included ...view middle of the document...
Is there bias in the sample used in the study?
There is no bias in the sample used because the study was not focused on one particular denomination, but included different sects and beliefs. However this is only a small sample not a world sample due to the fact that a larger sample would not be practical, nor would it be possible to maintain the constantly fluctuating changes within so many churches on such a grand scale.
Are there any problems in defining or measuring the variables of interest in the study?
In this study when a larger poll , reports and inventories were used for comparison there was no significant statistical variance. Also there were problems in defining or measuring the variables of interest in this study because the article does not provide exact numbers as to how many parishioners any given church had converted or how many simply changed churches. The average growth in the most successful churches was only 5-10% but this was only due to patrons coming from other churches. American churches have seen a growth rate of about 40% since the early 1900’s.
Are there any confounding variables present in the study?
The confounding variable in this analysis are the population of the churches included in the study in relation to how many converts that are new v. how many people have just changed churches. Let C = % of Converts and M = % of Migrated to = X as the variable which would show the actual number of new members and converts.( C - M = X ). To determine the exact ratio of C and M, factors (number of converts and number of migrants ) that are needed are not provided in this article therefore, this equation can not be solved based on the information given.
Are the results presented fairly?
The results for this study have been presented based only on the information available ( See Fig 1 - 6 ). For this study statistical information that was derived from following these churches over the 15 year period were compiled and presented as the facts dictated. No other factors were included in determining the outcome of the results.
Is the study’s conclusion reasonable? Does it make sense?
The question most asked is “ Has the Church as a whole grown because of the church growth movement?” Both no and yes would be correct. Churches that are not bound in turmoil and conflict seem to do better than their smaller counterpart. This is in addition to the practice of the 44 rules of church growth principles which encompass a way of life and culture. It should also be noted that in order for any organization to grow and prosper, it is imperative that it has a strong leader or in this case pastor. Without strong leadership and the proper guidance no institution can be expected to succeed. So for this study the results do make sense as the facts represent.
Do the results make practical significance?
To say that the results make practical significance would make me appear bias in my own opinion. This has been an indepth study of...