Compare the different viewpoints presented by indigenous and non-indigenous people about invasion and colonisation in Australia.
When comparing the different viewpoints presented by the indigenous and non-indigenous peoples of Australia, in relation to invasion and colonization, it is evident that different ideas circulate throughout the people of Australia as to what appropriate term should be used. In terms of invasion the following two examples substantiate a view of invasion, these are the national Day of Mourning and the establishment of the tent embassy outside parliament old parliament house in Canberra. In regards to colonization the following two examples of the ...view middle of the document...
This statement supports a strong view of invasion, these words come from the indigenous peoples themselves so it must mean something, but people aren't listening.
One of the most powerful protests that indigenous peoples have participated in relation to equal opportunity and to present the view of invasion. On 26th January 1972, a group of young Aborigines erected a beach umbrella on the lawns of Parliament House in Canberra, with a sign saying 'Aboriginal Embassy'. Over the next months, thousands joined their demonstration, which captured national and international attention, before being finally dispersed by police in July. The establishment of the embassy supports the view of invasion because it shows that the once historic aboriginal culture was on the brink of extinction and destruction, of which could have only been possible with a forceful European invasion. You cannot simply destroy a culture by peacefully colonising the land. Mum Shirl an indigenous elder quotes ''it said to white Australia, 'You've kicked us down for the last time''. This primary statement acknowledges the wrongs committed by the Europeans(white Australia) in the dispossession of culture, land, identity and most important of all the invasion of the country.
The initial feeling of the British feeling somewhat superior to that of the Aborigines supports a viewpoint for colonisation and occupation of the land under no permissions whatsoever from the Aboriginal people. White people, claimed that they had greater natural abilities and a higher standard of civilisation, which soon justified what was happening. When they later looked backwards on their short time in Australia, they began to revere the achievements of pioneering whites. The achievements of the Aboriginal people, and the story of what had happened between whites and Aborigines, were ignored or quickly passed over. This feeling of supremacy and it alone was a strong evidential belief that instigated the so called colonisation of Australia, of which is a perfectly valid white viewpoint that should be taken in account. The Europeans strongly believed that so called people wearing no clothes, talking foreign tongues, waving spears in the air, living in huts with no territorial fences and no form of currency were savages and in turn were inferior to the British Victorian way of living. A statement from ''the Eora Confront the British handout'' had the British stating '' The British claimed to be a civilised people bringing the arts and sciences to a backward land''. This highly controversial claim supports a notion of colonisation in the fact that the British truly had it brainwash into...