Figure 1 is a pie chart which shows the reasons why people had visited Cambridge. It illustrates whether tourists in Cambridge, at the time I collected my data, were there to visit the regenerated areas e.g. shopping or café/restaurant or to visit the more historical attractions e.g. university colleges or museums. I found that the majority of respondents went shopping. This shows that these tourists were not there for the history of Cambridge but were there to visit the regenerated areas, for example like the grand arcade. This figure relates to my hypothesis as it shows whether Cambridge is a honeypot site due to some of the areas in which people had visited.
Figure 2 ...view middle of the document...
Also it shows that an area like Cambridge does not appeal to international tourist’s as much as domestic tourists. Having a larger number of domestic tourists, suggests that some of the people that I collected my data from, may not have been at Cambridge to visit any attractions of regenerated areas, but were there to study as universities or to work.
Figure 4 is a photograph of Cambridge which shows several things. It shows a historical attraction within that area which is the Kings College, this particular attraction creates tourism within Cambridge as it draws tourists in due to its history. This then supports the hypothesis as it shows that some areas do show that Cambridge is a honeypot site. Figure 4 also shows conservation and shows that the area has been pedestrianized; this is shown as there is a car stopper in the middle of the road. It is also shown by the amount of bicycles that are in the photo. It suggests that people are considering the environment when travelling around Cambridge and are attempting to conserve the area as much as possible. There are also attractive green areas, which indicated several things; it shows that there is less pollution and that the area is more attractive to create more tourism.
Figure 5 is a photograph of the Grand Arcade in Cambridge. This is a regenerated area in Cambridge. This shows that Cambridge is not only about its historical attractions and that tourists do not only visit the history of Cambridge but visit the more regenerated areas. The grand arcade is a popular regenerated area to tourists and creates tourism in Cambridge. The photo also shows two types of conservation to area. One being a large litter bin next to a bus stop, this is showing that Cambridge are also trying to look after the regenerated areas as well as the historical attractions by putting bins where a large amount of tourists would generally be. Also, there is 2 bikes parked up against some sort of pole. This shows that many people are using more environmentally friendly transport to move around Cambridge. This refers to my hypothesis as it shows that there are also regenerated areas in Cambridge as well as historical. It also shows that areas like the grand arcade are looked after as much as an area of history such as Kings College.
Figure 6, a bar graph showing how people travelled to Cambridge show the accessibility of Cambridge. It shows that, there are many ways to get to Cambridge and that tourists use a variety of transport to do so. It shows that the majority of people travelled to Cambridge by car. This could possibly mean that the majority of people were domestic tourists and had not come from far to get to Cambridge.
Arguments for and against my hypothesis:
Figure 1, pie chart showing why people visited Cambridge supports figure 2 (scatter graph). On figure 2 it shows that at data collection point two, which was the grand arcade a regenerated area, my pedestrian count was the highest. Also...