Duma Member: Right Or Left? Essay

1564 words - 7 pages

The first twenty years of the nineteenth century for Russia was such a time in which change and inconsistency were consistent. At the turn of the century, Nicholas II was struggling to keep power as aristocracy was losing it control over Russia. As serfdom was dying due to the emancipation, the lower class was rising for more representation. And while these two conflicting movements are happening, a world war was on the brink. In V.V. Shulgin’s The Years: Memoirs of a Member of the Russian Duma, 1906-1917, Shulgin gives his readers an in-depth look at Russia before the war, during the war, and after the war. As there are many accounts of this time in Russia’s history, there are few in which ...view middle of the document...

Shulgin cited that the Poles objective was to elect as much Poles into the Duma, and as a result they intentionally wanted less chairs to go to the Russians. He questions himself, asking “But how does one get, say, forty electors for the Second Duma out of the seven who turned up for the first?” He did so by attracting the Czech immigrants, priests, peasants and (like himself) landowners with about sixty representatives from Shulgin’s Ostrozhsk district; only thirteen would be elected as members of the Second Duma.
Although his leadership rose through the meetings of the Russians, he still had shown some division between the four groups. When discussing who to vote for on the eve of elections, Shulgin stated that the landowners had to worry about who they were going to vote for, and the peasants would worry about themselves. This almost brings out the autocratic views in Shulgin, as before the October Manifesto the upper class would not care too much about the serfs and peasants; in fact they didn’t too much afterwards. They would let them go about their own agendas after the emancipation in 1861, if they could. So although he manages to unify the southern Russians, he still has some sectionalist views, perhaps at a social standpoint.
It is rather interesting taking a look at Shulgin as a member of the Duma. As a rightist, he supported the Tsar and his control over Russia. However, he decides to participate in the Second, Third and Fourth Dumas, which can be regarded as the product of the October Manifesto and the reforms that would go along with it. As the reforms would favor more rights to the people, it becomes confusing that Shulgin would agree with this, unless he would not agree with that kind of change, but others that were promised through the Manifesto. He says abut Prime Minister Pyotr Stolypin: “… I considered his program the only one that could save Russia and enable her evolutionary development to continue.” As Stolypin was extensive in his desire for reform, it becomes more confusing to see what direction Shulgin was headed.
As World War I began, Shulgin decides to join the army and the fight against Germany and Austria-Hungary. It was very rare for a member of the Duma to join the military, as they were granted exemption from the battles. This puts him aside from the other Duma members who did not join the army, as he wanted to fight. No one forced him to go, and no one influenced him; he did it to serve his country. This would be the second way in which he served his country, with the first being a member of the Duma. He could be seen as a true nationalist, trying to bring together Russia, by any means.
During the war, there were many times in which Shulgin showed his leadership capabilities. As his role in the army turned into picking up wounded soldiers during the Great Retreat of 1915, he shows those leadership skills. When picking up stragglers, he would have train cars to his area in no time to pick up the...

Other Essays Like Duma Member: Right Or Left?

The Rise of Communism in Russia

2569 words - 11 pages which it has had ever since. The Left SRs like the right SRs and the Mensheviks, continued to function in the soviets as a more or less legal opposition until the outbreak of large-scale civil war in the middle of 1918. At that point the opposition parties took positions which were either equally vocal or openly anti-Bolshevik, and one after another, they were suppressed. The Eastern Front had been relatively quiet during 1917, and shortly after

A Report Into Recent Events In Russia

780 words - 4 pages population. I don't think I can truly convey the severity of the issue of the near breaking point of Russia's ruling. It began with the peasants feeling cheated and when compared to England they lead appalling lives. Right from the start, the Provisional Government was not really in control. It had to share power with the Petrograd Soviet and was set up by the Tsar basically to fail so that he could show his people that the

Tsar Nicholas Ii Downfall

1872 words - 8 pages over-flowing the jails. Police patrolled most of the streets of Russia. Peasants were in heavy debt, most not being able to pay off expensive mortgages, and the general public of Russia were disallowed political or religious expression. These factors painted a very bleak and violent picture of Russia at this time, mainly due to Nicholas’ repressive regime. On the 22nd January, Father Georgy Gapon, a priest, lead a peaceful march to Nicholas

Gta 5 Cheats

1182 words - 5 pages Enter one of the following codes while playing. Using cheats will disable Trophies for the current session. 5 minutes of Invincibility: Right, X, Right, Left, Right, R1, Right, Left, X, Triangle Full Health & Armor: Circle, L1, Triangle, R2, X, Sqaure, Circle, Right, Square, L1, L1, L1 Unlock weapons: Triangle, R2, Left, L1, X, Right, Triangle, Down, Square, L1, L1, L1 Super Jump (hold Square to jump higher): Left, Left

ww1 responsible for downfall of Tsarist regime

1150 words - 5 pages - also goes a long way to explain his political naivete in many of the difficult situations he faced. Was this unwillingness to face the political realities due to him being blinded be his obstinate belief in autocracy or was it just that he was politically naïve? Throughout his rule as discontent rose Nicholas still believed that he still had the support of all his people save for a couple of 'undesirables'. In a sense he was living in an

problems faced by the Tsar

1148 words - 5 pages goes a long way to explain his political naivete in many of the difficult situations he faced. Was this unwillingness to face the political realities due to him being blinded be his obstinate belief in autocracy or was it just that he was politically naïve? Throughout his rule as discontent rose Nicholas still believed that he still had the support of all his people save for a couple of 'undesirables'. In a sense he was living in an

To What Extent Was the Impact of the First World War Responsible for the Downfall of Tsarism in March 1917?

1720 words - 7 pages defeats very early on. The Tsar believed they could win the war against Germany really easily. However, they did not realise how powerful the German army was. In the Battle of Tattenburg tens of thousands were dead or wounded and within a week at the Battle of Masurian Lakes the Russian army lost another 100,000 soldiers. Morale decreased visibly, worsened not only by the shortages or bad transport system but by bad news from the front. Despite

Bolsheviks Seizure of Power

1393 words - 6 pages complications that lowered their status among the Russian people, and left them in a venerable situation for the Bolsheviks to manipulate. The provisional government of Duma Deputies took over the government, after the Tsar's abdication, but soon the Petrograd Soviet made sure that they could not act without their support. The Soviet gave an instruction, named Order No. 1, which stated that soldiers and sailors were to obey their officers and the government

Russian Church

2449 words - 10 pages century. After the civil war and Polish intervention during the Time of Troubles (1598-1613), Mikhail Romanov, as the legend went, was elected by the entire Russian population, therefore reuniting the Holy Russian land behind the Romanov dynasty and saving Orthodox Russia from the Catholics. (Carr 125). The idea of Russia as a holy land contributed to the Tsar s position not as a king ruling with a divine right, but a god on earth. There was, in fact

The Extent to Which the March 1917 Revolution in Russia was Caused by World War One

1355 words - 6 pages low morale in the army; in February 1917 there were already 6 million dead soldiers and 4.2 million seriously wounded. The numerous deaths among officers led to the promotion of many middle class people who were not very loyal to the Tsar or experienced. The discontent was accentuated by the poor supply of equipment. In 1914, the soldiers needed 18 million rifles but only received 7 million. Due to the hunger and cold many

The Reasons For Success Of The Bolsheviks In 1917

1220 words - 5 pages troops. The Kadets who wanted to give more powers to the Russian parliament or Duma. This party could be compared to the Liberals in Britain. They greatly admired the British system of government and wished to imitate it, i.e. a constitutional monarchy – power of the Tsar would be greatly reduced and important decisions would be made by parliament. They were led by the respected Prince Lvov. The Social

Related Papers

Evaluation Of Stolypin's Reforms Essay

2281 words - 10 pages in 1905" Stolypin's reforms could "have changed the face of politics and society, yet they left the unreformed autocracy to face the onslaught of the First World War and it's attendant social and economic strains". Despite the latter, it seems erroneous to attribute total failure to Stolypin's reforms. After the devastating actions of Bloody Sunday in 1905, the Tsar Nicholas II had been given two choices, which was to repress or reform. To

Could Tsarism Have Saved Itself In The Last Decade Of The Xix Century And The First Decade Of The Xx Century?

1778 words - 8 pages interest or ability to reign. Tsar Nicholas was not particularly a strong leader and was easily influenced by Rasputin. He was willing to make the least reforms possible and "preserve the principle of autocracy". Did not give the Duma much power. Did not increase freedoms (of speech, religion, movement and language). From Alexander III to Nicholas II, Russia did not have many social reforms.The political, economical and social structure of Russia

Fall The Tsar 1917 Essay

1468 words - 6 pages alienated the key sections of the society he depeded on for support. This could be seen when an aristocratic member of the duma took the lead in 1917 in refusing to disband on the tsar’s orders. Therefore, the Tsar’s limited powers of judgment blind him to the need to make an accommodation with his natural supporters and hence this resulted in a growth of opposition as well as weakening of the support of the tsardom to withstand it. Indeed, the most

The Rise Of Communism In Russia

2453 words - 10 pages claimed Marxist party was bit organized until 1898. In that year a "congress" of nine men met at Minsk to proclaim the establishment of the Russian Social Democratic Worker's Party. The Manifesto issued in the name of the congress after the police broke it up was drawn up by the economist Peter Struve, a member of the moderate "legal Marxist" group who soon afterward left the Marxist movement altogether. The manifesto is indicative of the way