[Type the company name]
President Zuma`s letdown approach to deliver a sound foreign policy indicates a failure. Factors of negligence and corruption within top officials have put the South African foreign policy brand into shame on the International relations platform. The failure to observe the policies on the Government White paper associates the current Administration with incompetency. The vocal tone of discontentment by the social forces indicate the State`s inability to perform the policies outlined on the Government`s diplomacy of Ubuntu.
South Africa`s role in the COP17 indicates the State`s incoherence on their foreign policy. ...view middle of the document...
The fact that Africa has many renewable sources, President Zuma`s Administration should have taken a stance and encourage investment through public sectors like Eskom as outlined in the government`s white paper (South African Government White Paper on Foreign Policy 2011). The result would see Africa through the South African foreign policy evolving to become an environmental friendly place.
The Government`s action on Medupi undermines its estimated role on the climate conference. According to (Watson n.d.), he criticizes saying, “If President Zuma cared about climate he would halt the $21 billion at Medupi and creation of 40 new mines”. Prior the Medupi, the nation emits high amounts of carbon (Bonellie 2015). The approval of the World Bank loan for Medupi (Friedman 2010) construction shows how the foreign policy prioritizes to invest in projects which blow in high profits and at the same time, it shows its reluctance of addressing climate friendly policies to ensure the future health of its citizens.
Furthermore, it becomes ironic that the anticipated country to lead the role in climate change is actually contributing to global warming and environmental degradation. These actions result in the President Zuma Administration being viewed as stubborn to the agreed polices of creating a friendly climatic environment. The campaign by Climatic Justice Now which cried for fairness on the environment seemed to have been given a deaf ear by the action of allowing the Medupi power station which will further worsen the Carbon Dioxide emission of this country (Austin-Evelyn 2011).
The military presence in Central African Republic indicates failure of delivering sound foreign policy by President Zuma. According to (Heitman 2013), 200 soldiers were dispatched to Bangui without parliamentary approval. To an extent, the sending of the soldiers was justified. This is because it aligns with the Government Foreign policy that, “South Africa must continue support regional and continental processes to respond and resolve crises (South African Government White Paper on Foreign Policy 2011). However, the procedure without parliamentary approval raised suspicions as far as the formality procedures of sending troops are concerned. This erupted rumors of corruption, an example, the source (Mail & Guardian 2013) reported that there were ANC linked deals and included individuals like Paul Langa and Perreira involved in diamonds. It brings the corrupt nature of the foreign policy under the President Zuma Administration which appears to be influenced by the elite socials. It brings how the foreign policy is made to suit the needs of corrupt individuals whilst putting the lives of soldiers at risk.
The consequences of the military presence in C.A.R brought mixed reactions back at home. Firstly, the death of thirteen military personnel made President Zuma to mention that they died for a worthy cause and observed the country`s foreign policy (Patel 2013). Although...