This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Groupthink Essay

2245 words - 9 pages

Week Three Assignment
Groupthink
Jeffrey H Bowen
Averett University
Business Psychology PSY218
Instructor: Kathie Tune
August 12, 2014

On the morning of January 28, 1986, the nation watched as the ill-fated mission of the Space Shuttle Challenger 51-L, lifted off from Kennedy Space Center on NASA’s twenty fifth space shuttle mission. 73 seconds into the flight, Space Shuttle Challenger exploded into a ball of fire. As the events unfolded live on national television, questions began to surface on the reasons for the catastrophic failure almost immediately.
“The Challenger STS 51-L mission was commissioned to deploy the second Tracking and Data Relay Satellite and the Spartan ...view middle of the document...

However the Challenger incident also presented a flaw in organizational communication and ethics, including the ethics of organizational structure and culture as it promotes or discourages necessary communication and more importantly the ethics of groupthink.
It is critical to understand the definition and specific examples as well as the reasons why groupthink affected NASA and its employees during the time of the Challenger incident. Groupthink, is a concept developed by social psychologist Irving Janis. “Groupthink occurs when a group makes faulty decisions because group pressures lead to a deterioration of “mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment. Groups affected by groupthink ignore alternatives and tend to take irrational actions that dehumanize other groups.  A group is especially vulnerable to groupthink when its members are similar in background, when the group is insulated from outside opinions, and when there are no clear rules for decision making” (Janis, 1982). What were the signs that group loyalty caused NASA members to slip into a groupthink mentality? The eight symptoms of groupthink show a groupthink mentality did in fact affect the Challenger incident. The first two stem from overconfidence in the group’s overconfidence. The next pair reflect the tunnel vision members use to view the problem and the final four symptoms are signs of strong conformity pressure within the group: All, excepts below were taken directly from examples proposed in the Rogers Commission Report, 1986:
* “Illusion of Invulnerability.  Despite the launch pad fire that killed three astronauts in 1967 and the close call of Apollo 13, the American space program had never experienced an in-flight fatality. When engineers raised the possibility of catastrophic O-ring blow-by, NASA manager George Hardy nonchalantly pointed out that this risk was ‘‘true of every other flight we have had." Summarizes attitude as ‘‘everything is going to work out all right because we are a special group.

* Belief in Inherent Morality of the Group.  Under the sway of groupthink, members automatically assume the rightness of their cause. At the hearing, engineer Brian Russell noted that NASA managers had shifted the moral rules under which they operated: ‘‘I had the distinct feeling that we were in the position of having to prove that it was unsafe instead of the other way around.

* Collective Rationalization.  Despite the written policy that the O-ring seal was a critical failure point without backup, NASA manager George Hardy testified that ‘‘we were counting on the secondary O-ring to be the sealing O-ring under the worst case conditions." Apparently this was a shared misconception. NASA manager Lawrence Mulloy confirmed that ‘‘no one in the meeting questioned the fact that the secondary seal was capable and in position to seal during the early part of the ignition transient." This collective rationalization supported a mindset of ‘‘hear no evil,...

Other Essays Like Groupthink

The Classic Cast of Coke Classic: Fizzled Decision Making

573 words - 3 pages that it wasn’t going anywhere anytime soon. Yes, I think that groupthink can be blamed for the “New Coke” decision. According to page 103 of, Management: Leading and Collaborating in the Competitive World, groupthink occurs when people choose not to disagree or raise objections because they don’t want to break up a positive team spirit . I highly doubt that everybody thought exactly the same thing about the “New Formula”, or that there was a

Business Failure Essay

921 words - 4 pages . 436). According to Scharff, they fired the CEO, COO, CFO, controller, general counsel, the entire board of directors and more than 400 finance and accounting employees (Scharff, 2005). This shows that upper management along with lower management did not operate ethically within the company. Several statements have been made stating that they were operating in something called groupthink. Groupthink is caused when concurrence seeking becomes

Evaluate Why Groups May Not Be Trusted to Make Good Decisions

2042 words - 9 pages they have even heard any facts? Janis (1972) came up with the idea of groupthink, this is when a group come together to make a decision but the need to come to a unanimous decision becomes more important than making an actual rational decision, and facts concerning the decision are seen as not important. Janis (1972) believed that groups are likely to succumb to groupthink if they have a strong direct leader, high levels of stress throughout the

12 Angry Men Final Paper

1601 words - 7 pages group’s decision. Right from the beginning of the movie, eleven jurors voted in favor of convicting the accused boy before even discussing the evidence presented at the trail. This is where the concept of groupthink comes into play. We have learned that when working in groups, members are more likely to make riskier decisions than they would on their own. This results from the fact that when working in groups, no one individual is completely

Mount Everest Case Analysis

943 words - 4 pages gave problems to the teams, both teams decided to push forward. In a firm, lack of cooperation within management indicates an issue for the overall performance of the firm, usually in a negative direction. Although the teams had issue with acclimatization, both teams pushed forward. To add to the problem guides who take the roll of managers, underwent groupthink. Although guides and clients felt uncomfortable turning back, both lacked the

Examining Business Failure

1073 words - 5 pages - gain.The organizational structure may have also contributedThe unethical behavior of WorldCom executives may have resulted from a behavioral style called "groupthink." This behavior occurs in teams or cohesive groups, the rational is group pressure, self- censorship, creating culture and unethical concerns. WorldCom lacked a corporate code of ethics and ethics training.References:Retrieved February 20, 2010 findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5383Retrieved February 20, 2010 www.abacon.com/commstudies/groups/ groupthink .htm PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1

Psy/400 Portfolio Part I

920 words - 4 pages .)? They all loved to teach and help the students as much as they could. This was their similar characteristic. • Was there any indication that members might be vulnerable to Groupthink? Why or why not? No one was not vulnerable to Groupthink because they all were positive thinkers and allowed each one to give their opinion without any negative outbursts. • In your opinion, how did the collective group behaviors influence individual attitudes

Group Influence

1604 words - 7 pages . Everyone seemed to be in agreement with bowling. There was no evidence that any of the members might be vulnerable to groupthink. This is a group that does not appear to have a problem with speaking up or going against the grain. There were a couple of times during the meeting when one or two completely disagreed with what was said and spoke out. At one point, one member agreed to disagree on the subject of warm transfers. There are times

Organisational Learning

2335 words - 10 pages management (Fineman, 2003). These reactions obviously aren’t helpful to organisation, however, these actions are bonding to group members like they might have been during childhood (Fineman, 2003). It is in some way similar to the effects in groupthink which prevent further learning. Leaders have to be emotionally intelligent in order to recognize emotions in themselves as well as others. This include the ability to detect anomalies in other’s behaviour

Social Influences on Behavior

1248 words - 5 pages is caused by the differences between groups and the similarities of things in the same group. Groupthink is a phenomenon that can occur in the social identity theory. Groups that are affected by groupthink ignore alternatives and take irrational actions that dehumanize other people and groups. Since most people in the social identity theory have members with the same background, they have no outside opinions and also have no clear rules for

Leading the Project Team

2688 words - 11 pages awareness of different approaches to the problems of staffing teams and the subsequent leadership of them. In this manner, the possibilities for application of these theories are introduced at a basic level. Topic Content Groups and Teams Walker (1996) provides an overview of two types of thinking that clearly illustrate differences between groups and teams. These are termed, quite appropriately, Teamthink and Groupthink. These

Related Papers

Groupthink Essay

1045 words - 5 pages Groupthink By Paul ‘t Hart Draft entry for K.M. Dowding (ed), Sage Encyclopedia of Power, London: Sage 2008 This Orwellian-sounding term was adopted in 1971 by Yale psychologist Irving L. Janis to refer to a pathological form of group decision making which he alleged was a root cause behind several fiascoes in U.S. foreign policy. Groupthink has since been invoked as an explanation of all sorts of governmental, corporate

The Groupthink Theory Essay

1213 words - 5 pages The Groupthink Theory “Researchers have studied the influence of group pressure on individual members” (Byars and Rue, 2007, 238). As defined by Byars and Rue “when group members lose their ability to think as individuals and conform at the expense of their good judgment, groupthink occurs. Members become unwilling to say anything against the group or any member, even if an action is wrong” (Byars and Rue, 2007, 238). “Keeping a group

The Threat And Avoiding Of Groupthink

1393 words - 6 pages The Threat and Avoiding of Groupthink The ability into understanding groupthink and the threat it poses on decision-making within a group can better assist project managers (PM) and teams in taking necessary measures in avoiding the pitfalls of groupthink. Decision-making is a normal and unavoidable process within a group. At some point group/teams will be involved in determining a course of action required in completing a task or project

2003 Us Invasion Of Iraq And The Application Of Groupthink Theory

1163 words - 5 pages fail under the pressures of Groupthink Theory, whether or not you personally believe we should or shouldn’t have gone to war. Irving Janis defined groupthink as “a mode of thinking that people engage in when there are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members’ striving for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action” (Griffin). There are eight symptoms of group think, seven of which