This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Human Rights: Universalists Vs Culturalists Essay

1729 words - 7 pages

Human Rights – Universalists and Relativists
There are several key issue that divide Universalists and relativists in the ongoing debate about the cross-cultural implementation of human rights. This paper will focus on the arguments in which a universal rights regime sought to defend its cross-cultural validity, as well as the arguments that the proponents of Cultural particularity resisted or rejected. In answering these questions, it is important that we first establish certain key concepts and views, such as the views universalists and relativists held, and the potential objections that can be raised against such views. In particular, we will turn to Charney’s and Bell’s work ...view middle of the document...

But this only begs the question, that is, what makes it the case that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is in fact universal and not merely the subjective opinions of individuals? This question aside, we must note that the idea of universal human rights is deeply seeded in the Western liberal school of thought. Moreover, Charney argued that any talk about human rights is simply moot if it limits itself to “cultural particular” talk by suggesting that there is absolutely “no point in talking about fundamental human right at all” (Charney p845-847).
The relativists believe that there is no such thing as an objective standard of right and wrong. But rather, what is right or wrong is based on culture. The basic conception in understanding morality is the observation that different cultures posses different set of moral values. That is, every culture has erected its own set of values, codes, or principles that it deems as being both true and correct. Most people think and would argue that there is such a thing as being right or wrong, true or false, but cultural relativism suggests that what we call true or right is really based on tradition and custom. Our ancestors created belief systems and passed these on to future generations that never really bothered to verify their accuracy, but rather embraced them as purely objective facts. This future generation then passes their values onto the next generation creating a cyclical phenomenon. Consequently, we are left with the view that standards of what is right and wrong completely depend on what a particular regime declares it to be. Since each regime creates its own value a system that means each regime will have a different value system that they uphold. Essentially we have many cultures believing in the objectivity of their beliefs, when really their beliefs are true only insofar as the culture says it’s true. In other words, what is true and correct is relative to a particular regime. Thus by the arguments we have laid out, it seems that the cross-cultural implementation of human rights is called into question. If values are relative, and not based on any objective standard, the relativists’ line of reasoning makes us question why should any regime advocate for the cross-cultural implementation of basic human rights for all if such an implementation would be arbitrary, in the sense that it is subjective and unfounded? But before we examine this further, we will lay out a more detailed account of the relativists’ position.
One can portray cultural relativism as such: what appears to be so to culture A is true for culture A, and what appears to be so to culture B is true for culture B. Cultural relativism seems to be claiming that what any culture asserts is the measure of all things for that culture. Cultural relativism instills doubt and undermines our common sense belief of universality, objectivity, and a morality based on such...

Other Essays Like Human Rights: Universalists vs Culturalists

Abortion Ethics Essay

925 words - 4 pages The argument of abortion has been raging since the Supreme Court case, Roe vs. Wade, in 1973. This court case has divided the country into two factions: pro-choice and pro-life. Pro-life advocates argue that abortions are murder and extreme levels of child abuse. While pro-choice advocates believe abortions are a justifiable means to end pregnancies. The pro-choice argument is that the fetus is not yet a human being and its rights should not

Locke And The Legitimacy Of The State: Right Vs. Good

728 words - 3 pages social contract is created when human beings unite and the majority of a people agree upon a particular state which protects mans natural freedom and equality. Consequently, since all human beings have certain moral rights to health, liberty, and possessions; they also have the right to enforce the protection of those rights by way of punishing violators. And it is in this maintaining of ones own rights that it is necessary for

Influence of the Civil Rights Movement on Black/White Marriage

2214 words - 9 pages the Civil Rights Movement, which we called “anti-miscegenation laws”. This paper will examine how the Civil Rights Movement helped make marriages between blacks and whites and mixed-race families acceptable to society and more common. In this paper, I am going to provide the background about the Civil Rights Movement. Such as ways this movement affected Black/White marriage, and the Loving vs. Virginia (the Supreme Court Case). Then, I will

Death Penalty: an Exaggerated Punishment

1524 words - 7 pages question under the auspices of the sociological imagination that inquires the conscience of the nation as human beings? Again, he questions the integrity of the people involved in the whole death penalty execution process by asking who they really are as human beings. He goes on conclude that the view of the death penalty as a just way of punishment that is the good (lawful citizens) vs. bad (criminals) rather dehumanizes us all (“Humanizing the Death

The Civil Rights Movement

1622 words - 7 pages Credit Opportunity Act prohibited lenders from discriminating against women. Women also brought about challenge to unfavorable laws. In 1973 the Supreme Court in Roe vs. Wade sanctioned women's right to abortion during the early months of pregnancy. This was a significant victory for the women's movement. So during the civil rights movement it wasn’t just including African Americans, but Hispanic Americans, Native Americans, American youth and

Strategic Management

2303 words - 10 pages across geographic borders – Europe, through the European Union (EU) is the world’s largest single market • EU vs U.S. GDP: 35% higher – Emerging major competitive forces: China & India – In summary: globalization increased economic interdependence among countries as reflected in the flow of goods and services, financial capital, and knowledge across country borders ©2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or

Stock Market

586 words - 3 pages Free Will vs. Determinism Socrates: “What is the definition of determinism?” Maria: “It, the theory or doctrine that acts of will and occurrences in nature or social or psychological phenomena are usually caused by preceding events or natural laws? Socrates: “What is the definition of free will?” Maria: “Free will is a voluntary choice or decision, freedom of humans to make choices that are not determined by prior causes or divine

False Imprisonment as a Tort

5472 words - 22 pages had reasonable grounds for his suspicion. 19 HARI PRIYA NALSAR Chapter 5: CONCLUSION The tort of false imprisonment is one of the most severe forms of human rights violation. Recognition of the human being in the convicted offender is necessary. The Indian socio-legal system is based on non-violence, mutual respect and human dignity of the individual. Even the prisoners have human rights because the prison

Abortion - How can I Impose My Morality on Another?

1062 words - 5 pages basic rights of others. An abortion is an act of violence which victimizes another human being, and thus is not a valid "choice."   So what would be wrong with being "personally opposed" to abortion while recognizing the rights of others to choose? Well, why are you opposed to abortion? It must be because abortion takes the life of a preborn child...otherwise, there would be no reason to oppose it. So how can you say "I'm opposed to

The Difference Between the Feminist Movement of 1960 and That of Today

1207 words - 5 pages movement for the right of women to govern their own sexuality .In 1972 the supreme court extended the rights to birth control to unmarried women. In the following year the famous Roe vs. Wade which legalized abortion was finally law, and for the first time women finally able to have full control of their bodies. On economic matters, the feminist movement advocated for workplace rights, including maternity leave, and against other forms of gender

Constitution and Systems of the State Paper

961 words - 4 pages   Constitution and Systems of the State Paper 2Texas Constitution vs. U.S. Constitution the Constitution was created by the founding fathers for two purposes. The Constitution is to establish a federal government for the United States and to delegate limited powers to the federal government. Serving as basic principles of government for the nation, the Constitution implies laws, customs and institutions within one single document. The U.S

Related Papers

The Declaration Of The Rights Of Man Vs The Universal Declaration Of Human Rights

1025 words - 5 pages The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are both effective social contracts. Events and experience that caused some type of conflict, sparked the need for change; the realization that something had to be done in order to protect and benefit the people. These two documents allowed people to have rights, which at the time would have been a groundbreaking assertion as it set forth new laws and principles

Work2110 Essay

1073 words - 5 pages ; relationships are more important in deciding what is right/good (CHINA - contracts don't matter so much, acts as a starting point only)Universal: contracts govern business relationships (lawyers are essential in the US!)Individualism vs. communitarianismIndividualistic: focus on self, personal freedom, competitiveness (laws and rules preserve rights of individual) [NETHERLANDS]Communitarian: group membership, social responsibility, harmonious

Men And Women, Who Made A Difference In The Civil Rights Movement, Impact Of Civil Rights Laws And The Effects From The Civil Rights Movement

2371 words - 10 pages Men and Women, who made a difference in the civil rights movement, impact of civil rights laws and the effects from the civil rights movement. A Paper By Jabioas A’Martinezs Glenn Submitted In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for History 2112 Submitted To: Dr. John L. Rhodes, Sr. FVSU November 14, 2012 Civil rights are a class of rights based upon birthright into a designation otherwise of human rights

Landscapes Essay

533 words - 3 pages Lecture 1: Landscape concepts What are landscapes? Natural (natural sceneries) and built (well-known structures and buildings, ordinary sites and environments, human activities over space). Landscapes are not just the natural and physical features of the earth’s surface. But also features of the earth’s surface that are produced by humans, both those that inspire awe (iconic structures) as well as the more ordinary scenes and environments