American Intercontinental University
Unit 4 Individual Project
20 September 2014
Businesses immorality not only affected those employees but the lives of their families, as well as all those whom connected to the company. One will never know the extent of damage caused by immoral acts; the repercussions are too far reaching. In a business environment, a business should be more conscious of acting morally correct than any individual, because the number of live affected are incalculable.
In a business environment, why should people be moral as individuals?
Businesses should be morally responsible because the damage they can do is monumental. Businesses that ...view middle of the document...
Therefore, killing in this instance is morally right. Deontological ethics supports the position that the factory owner from above did not act morally. The building code set the standards for a safe building. An inspection stated that the building was not constructed properly. However, the owner did not worry over the unsafe quality of the building or the morally correct thing to do and the consequences of putting workers in this situation. A categorical imperative is that the owner new he was in the wrong and made the decision to do it anyway. A categorical imperative is a moral obligation or command that is unconditional and universally binding. (Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, 2014) An example of a categorical imperative is the bible, or the law; something that sates the basics of right and wrong.
Teleological ethics is the theory of morality that derives duty or moral obligation from what is good or desirable as an end to be achieved. (Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, 2014) In other words, when we make a choice which result in the correct consequences, then we are acting morally; when we make choices which result in the incorrect consequences, then we are acting immorally. Teleological ethics also supports an argument that a business has the obligation to act in a morally correct way. Because the owner of the factory made immoral decisions, the owner is immoral.
Moral objectivism is the position that certain acts are objectively right or wrong independent of an individual’s opinion. (Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, 2014) Ostensive, what someone believes is right or wrong does not necessarily mean that it is right or wrong. Moral objectivism means some acts are right or wrong by nature regardless of what an individual believes. Moral objectivism supports the position that the factory owner acted immorally. Because, the owner of the factory knew that the building was not safe, by anyone’s belief and the laws we live by, and used it anyway the owner did not act morally. It was fundamentally wrong to endanger the workers, therefore, the owner acted immorally. Moral relativism and moral absolutism both support the conclusions made herein. Moral relativism is the view that ethical standards, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and therefore subject to a person’s individual choice. (Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, 2014) Therefore, every individual’s morality is based on the experiences from their own life. Moral absolutism is...