17 October 2014
Helping or Hurting
Imagine a song comes on the radio that talks about how terrible life is on the streets. It’s worded in a way that makes you imagine yourself as a person whose home is pavement. You’re looked at as something repulsive taking up space. Constant ridicule and discrimination make it impossible for you to call anyone a friend, let alone trust another person. You are completely alone, watching other couples and friends laugh and walk by while you stand there hoping they notice you but wishing they wouldn’t because you’re an embarrassment to yourself. Yet, this song contains curse words and explicit language ...view middle of the document...
The internet is our “go-to” source for just about anything we need to know from who sex offenders are to what our rights as U.S. citizens are. Not only does it inform us of things we did not know but it also satisfies us. We gain a sense of satisfaction in knowing how our nation is being run or that convicts have been put in a prison. It’s human nature to want to know more about things that are happening around us. It’s also in our nature to be curious about things that are taboo or considered wrong in our society. There are adults and teenagers that are curious about nudity, drugs and violence. This does not necessarily mean that those teenagers and adults are going become meth addicted nudists who are abusive, it simply means they want to know more about the things that society shuns. The internet can provide a healthy amount of exposure to these things that can keep curiosity at bay instead of having a person go out and potentially endanger themselves by trying to discover more about these things. Censoring the internet of these things could provoke the crimes and violence rate to increase dramatically.
A poll of 20,512 respondents was conducted by WorldPublicOpinion.org, in which the article International Public Opinion Says Government Should Not Limit Internet Access states that this website is “a collaborative research project involving research centers from around the world”. This poll asked U.S. citizens if the people should have a right to access and read whatever is on the internet or if the government should have a right to limit what is looked at and read and seventy-five percent of people voted that the people should have the right. The public should have the right to read whatever is on the internet because not allowing us to do so would go against the constitution.
The ninth amendment in the United States Constitution protects the rights granted to the people that were not specifically enumerated within the Constitution. This amendment would protect the right to read whatever is on the internet. Apart from the ninth amendment, the first...