This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Jeremy Bentham And John Stuart Mill

1783 words - 8 pages

All of human life is marked by a series of problems and questions that must be confronted and answered. Everyday we face basic choices, to eat the ice cream or the cake, to swim or to bike, to play soccer or basketball, to read or watch TV. Such examples are trivial, but there are much more important ones with more foreboding consequences: to go to college or not, where to go, choosing a career, a spouse, a house. Yet, there are even more serious dilemmas that must be faced, some that may have eternal consequences: to go war or not, to lie and cheat or not, to unplug a loved one from a respirator, and so on. Such moral questions have enormous weight to them. And as human beings, we have no ...view middle of the document...

But Bentham is not so simple, not only is he an Ethical Hedonist, he is also a Psychological Egoistic Hedonist. It will be necessary here to define our terms. A Psychological Egoistic Hedonist believes that the only things that we do, or perhaps can, desire as ends are things that provide pleasure for ourselves. An Ethical Hedonist believes that the things that we ought to desire as ends are things that provide pleasure. It is assumed that an Ethical Hedonist will have altruistic tendencies, that is, we ought to desire ends that provide pleasure for some others at least some of the time. These two doctrines may seem to be opposed to one another. How could someone believe that the only things we can do is to provide pleasure for our self, and yet we ought to provide pleasure for others? And yet, Bentham holds both these positions. To understand how he reconciles this we must understand his doctrine of sanctions and his distinction between Natural Harmony of Interests and Artificial Harmony of Interests.

First then, Bentham characterizes four sanctions, physical, political, moral or popular, and religious. These sanctions are the sources of pleasure and pain. “There are four sources from which pleasure and pain are in use to flow: considered separately, they may be termed the physical, the political, the moral, and the religious: and inasmuch as the pleasures and pains belonging to each of them are capable of giving a binding force to any law or rule of conduct, they may all of them be termed sanctions” (Bentham 382). The physical sanction is basically all that occurs in the ordinary course of life due to the workings of nature and free from any human or supernatural interference. The political sanctions are sources of pleasure and pain that are brought about by a particular individual or groups of individuals whose purpose it is to judge and “dispense” of it according to the sovereign rule. The moral sanctions are those of any indiscriminate person who happens to personally make a judgment that does not necessarily reflect any concrete law. These sanctions provide the key to reconciling Bentham’s positions. One who observes all these sanctions must consider the judgments of others. The physical sanction is the only one that is irrespective of other humans. In order to maximize one’s happiness, he must get as much pleasure from these sources as possible, and most of these sources involve other people. This means one must rely on these people for happiness, in the way they judge and treat him. Therefore, if one is to maximize that happiness for himself, he must also be altruistic and increase the happiness of others who can influence his happiness for good or ill. And thus Bentham reconciles Psychological Egoistic Hedonism with Ethical Hedonism. Because we desire maximum pleasure for ourselves, we ought to increase the pleasure of those who can increase our own.

The second point that must be addressed is Bentham's distinction between...

Other Essays Like Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill

Pleasures in Terms of Morality and Physicality Stuart Mill

936 words - 4 pages Pleasures In Terms of Morality and Physicality Mill is generally accepted as a utilitarian philosopher, however about some points, he is opposed to Bentham who is best known as father of utilitarianism. Mill does not agree with the social and political results which Bentham comes to through utilitarianism. Both of them supports that utilitarianism is the idea that the moral worth of an action is determined solely by its utility in

Comparison and contrast of two Woman's Suffrage movement advocates, ?John Stuart Mills and Emmeline Pankhurst

429 words - 2 pages ..." Somewhat similarly to this stance is that of John Stuart Mills. He claims the injustices towomen were similar to that of slaves (although on a greatly lesser scale) and the new era called for achange. He states that, "the inequality of rights between men and women has no other source than thelaw of the strongest." However the two writers do come from different points of view, mainly due tothe fact of their differing genders. For example


523 words - 3 pages absolute or necessary in itself under utilitarianism. Utilatarianism Proposed by the English philosopher-reformer Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) in his 1789 book Principles Of Morals And Legislation it was developed by the English philosopher-economist John Stuart Mill (1806-73) in his 1863 book Utilitarianism. Bentham’s Formulation of Utilitarianism are firstly, man is under two great masters which is pain and pleasure. Secondly, the great good


911 words - 4 pages formula to determine the happiness quotient of the results which is the basis of Quantitative Utilitarianism. Bentham believed that it was possible to use his formula to decide which choice would produce the greatest amount of happiness (Bentham, 2013). This approach to utilitarianism is similar to using a list of pros and cons to make a decision (Wilkens, 2011). Qualitative Utilitarianism John Stuart Mill believed if moral decisions were based on

Explain Both the General Principles of Utilitarianism and the Distinctive Features of Rule Utilitarianism. (30 Marks)

964 words - 4 pages happiness than sadness, under Bentham’s thinking it would be the right thing to dosage being that the more happiness produced by these actions the better the world will be. Jeremy had a very much so Quantitative approach to his ethics that differs to J.S Mill, but his ideas are very important as without them J.S Mill really wouldn't have a theory to base it on. John Stuart Mill sought to address the weaknesses that had been found in Bentham’s

Business Morality

986 words - 4 pages bad, is a type of consequentialism. Notable philosophers who held this belief were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill (Board, 2015). The problems that arise with this belief are that it implies that it can sometimes be morally right to harm people if the outcome is positive and beneficial to even more people. In terms of business if one was to have utilitarian beliefs when making business decisions brings the possibility to overlook or harm

Liberalism As An Ideology

1945 words - 8 pages Bentham's footsteps was John Stuart Mill. In 1859 Mill published On Liberty in which he challenged "the tyranny of the majority" (Ball & Dagger, 70). Mill is an Utilitarian like Bentham and considered the leading liberal philosopher of the nineteenth century feared the power of those who were privileged to vote and control government and were "making social outcasts of individuals who do not conform to social customs and conventional beliefs

Ethical Theories

1181 words - 5 pages , practical wisdom and eudemonia, are the three main concepts that virtue ethics’ enforces. Aristotle and Plato are virtue ethics principle ethicists. Utilitarianism’s principal concepts are: egalitarianism, hedonism, consequentialism. This ethical system is based on a perception that a choice is moral when it has a result that is more positive for people. Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-73) who was actually one of Bentham’s

Swami Vivekananda

1133 words - 5 pages Western thinkers like Jeremy Bentham, Charles Darwin, David Hume, William S. Jevons, John Stuart Mill, Herbert Spencer, Auguste Comte, Rene Descartes, George Hegel, Baruch Spinoza and many more. The scientific ideas and the realistic analysis of those western thinkers shook the religious belief of Narendranath that he inherited from his childhood. They raised a tumult in his mind. In search of the link of the eastern and western thinking, he joined

Explain the Difference Between Bentham's Act Utilitarianism and Mill's Rule Utilitarianism (25)

910 words - 4 pages designed by Mill, states that that the act which produces the best act is the most desirable act - – “The greatest happiness for the greatest number”. The principle of utility states that actions are right if they promote pleasure but are wrong if they bring pain – “The greatest good [pleasure]for the greatest number.” Bentham believed that all pleasures are equal. However, Mill disagreed and stated that there were lower and higher pleasures

Philosophy Review

2522 words - 11 pages ethics is to promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Jeremy Bentham, an English philosopher, was the founder of utilitarianism; John Stuart Mill was its best-known defender. Schools of Philosophical Thought cont: Platonism - The philosophy of Plato, especially insofar as it asserts ideal forms as an absolute and eternal reality of which the phenomena of the world are an imperfect and transitory reflection. Aristotelianism

Related Papers

Philosopher John Stuart Mill Essay

1275 words - 6 pages explains that pleasure and pain can be qualitative and quantitative for example; if you have a project and it time consuming, stressful and mentally exhausting this is the quantitative aspect but getting recognition from your manager or top management on a job well done is the qualitative aspect and that is the pleasure. HISTORYOF JOHN STUART MILL Mill was educated by his father and Jeremy Bentham, the founder of Utilitarianism in modern

"On Liberty" By John Stuart Mill

1011 words - 5 pages What does John Stuart Mill think liberty is? That is a question that which I hope I can answer in the following essay.One of the main purposes of his essay is to make the reader think about how extreme limits and laws can be for the individual to still have his or her deserving rights. There has always been a struggle between freedom and power (laws). The stricter the system of laws, the less freedom we have. When you think about it, every law

John Stuart Mill Vs. Immanuel Kant

2228 words - 9 pages John Stuart Mill vs. Immanuel Kant The aim of this paper is to clearly depict how John Stuart Mill’s belief to do good for all is more appropriate for our society than Immanuel Kant’s principle that it is better to do what's morally just. I will explain why Mill’s theory served as a better guide to moral behavior and differentiate between the rights and responsibilities of human beings to themselves and society. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart

John Stuart Mill On Liberty Chapter 4: Of The Limits To The Authority Of Society Over The Individual

1642 words - 7 pages John Stuart MillOn LibertyChapter IV: Of the Limits to the Authority of Society over the IndividualOBJECTIVE PARTJ.S. Mill, in his extended essay On Liberty, more specifically in Chapter 4, discusses the appropriate level of authority that society should have over the individual. He starts by rejecting the idea of social contract previously founded by Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, yet acknowledges "the rights and duties