Word Count: 1239
jury nul paper
Similarity by Source
include quotedinclude bibliographyexclude small matchesdownloadrefreshprint
mode:show highest matches together show matches one at a time quickview (classic) report
Jury nullification must never happen. If this does take place it's intended to send a message to the criminal justice process that they think what the law stated is wrong. When jury nullification happens it's the jury taking the law into their own hands and overriding the whole criminal justice process. Jury nullification should ...view middle of the document...
They are likely to provide this individual a not guilty judgment depending on the mistreatment she or he has suffered from those trying to convict a member of his or her own ethnicity instead of work together with that person. The people as well as the police have turned out to be 2 different entities within these locations and rather than working together with one another and for one another they think they are working against one another. On the other side of this problem if a jury is made up of all minorities, and are set to place a judgment on a person in law enforcement force; they might be inclined to give a guilty judgment simply depending on the contrary information that the jury would have delivered a not guilty judgment to a person in his or her local community. Jury nullification happens whenever a part of the local community thinks they are treated unfairly or are trying to treat another part of the local community unfairly. Jury nullification is really a type of prejudice and discrimination motivated by racial discrimination and inequality. The Bronx jury is really a modern illustration of race-based jury nullification. "The Bronx jury is really a jury comprised of mostly minorities that decline to convict minority defendants" (Keneally, 2011, p.). The reasons behind Bronx juries are due to the belief that the criminal justice process focuses on minorities (Keneally, 2011). Bronx juries are presently increasing to other towns and states having a high number of minorities. This trend is described in a handful of varied causes. One reason why these juries aren't convicting minorities is to produce a report about how exactly the criminal justice process is racial. Another reason concentrates on reasonable doubt. Since there are several minorities that have experienced law enforcement wrong doings directly, they feel the accused might not be allowed a reasonable trial. Several jurors within these locations think that officials are prepared to tell a lie when they can help to make a sentence, and nullifying the law suit would keep innocent minorities out of jail. Based on Marder (1999), "The OJ Simpson court trial is yet another illustration of ethnicity based jury nullification." The reason being people in the jury thought law enforcement, and also the prosecution meddled with proof and had probable racial inspiration. As stated in the previously mentioned instance, jurors have become more conscious that they might prevent convicting the accused so long as the judge doesn't know that nullification was thought about prior to the trial starts. Race-based nullification is quickly growing, because jurors are more conscious of this decision-making authority. Paul Butler, an investigation professor of law and prior prosecuting lawyer, thinks that all minority, non-violent culprits must be acquitted of their offenses...