Path Goal Theory:
Decision-making test results:
After completing the ‘decision-making style test’ I found out that I am a “spontaneous/external decision maker” (Kent State University, 2015). This means, that I have a preference to make decisions quickly and based on what I feel is right (Kent State University, 2015). I often change my goals easily due to new preferences, hence why I will take risks and rarely construct a specific plan in regards to decision-making (Kent State University, 2015). The external components of my decision-making style include the preference to think after talking, thinking about decisions out loud, and consulting with others prior to making a decision (Kent ...view middle of the document...
210). In order to help others achieve their goals, this can be done through supportive leadership, directive leadership, participative leadership, or achievement-oriented leadership (Mind Tools, 1996)
How well would the path-goal approach work for you?
I believe in a workplace setting, the path-goal approach would work fairly well for myself. If I had a higher authority manager above me who was responsible for assigning tasks to me, I believe I wouldn’t have the autonomy to freely make decisions. In my past work experience positions, I have had leaders who have helped me develop as an individual. They impacted the improvement in my performance, and helped me achieve my workplace goals. As a follower, my characteristics consisted of having the desire to grow, the need to excel, and the need for clarity (Northouse, 2016). Since high productivity was perceived as the appropriate path, I was able to become a high producer (Georgopoulos, Mahoney, & Jones, 1957).
However, I believe for my personal goals, the path-goal approach would not work too well for me because no external followers have an impact on my personal goals. As I mentioned earlier, my decision-making style indicated that I tend to make decisions quickly, and that I have a preference to take risks. The path-goal approach involves a leader working closely with one to affect their performance. I don’t think I would be able to successfully make use of this theory, because it “is so complex and incorporates so many different aspects of leadership that interpreting the theory can be confusing” (Northouse, 2016, p. 123). The path-goal theory strictly focusses on the leader helping the follower only, which is a one way event (Northouse, 2016).
Would you need a lot of time to weigh different options before taking action?
I believe it depends on the type of decision I am making making to determine how much time I would need to weigh different options before taking action. I often find that if I am making a serious decision about something which will impact me on a life-long basis, I will analyze the various available options before I take any action. Also, when making decisions which may impact those around me such as in a workplace setting, I do prefer to analyze all of the available options before I make any sort of decision.
Would you seek out the advice of others before acting?
As stated in ‘decision-making test style’ I do have a preference for seeking...