Contemporary society has done enough to respond to the legacies of historical globalization
Criteria: What acts have actually been made to respond to the legacies of historical globalization? How have these effects been made in trying to respond to historical globalization? What has changed since then? What has not changed?
Position: I disagree that contemporary society has done enough to respond to the legacies of historical globalization for many reasons.
Reasons: Some of the reasons I think this statement is not true are, even thought society has improved since historical times, society still has many problems and is nowhere near being a perfect world and fixing every flaw. We see and ...view middle of the document...
It started in 1926, when black people outnumbered whites, with a ratio of 10:1. At this point the government decided to create a law that made sure the white population were able to keep political and economical control in their own hands. Parts of the apartheid still exist today such as racism and inequality. The law even restricted black people from voting and they only allowed them to have certain jobs and areas to live, they also forced the children to attend specific schools. Although Africa has continued to strengthen and grow, unfortunately poverty and inequality still plays a huge role today. It is even said that the amount remains “unacceptably high and the pace of reduction is unacceptably slow”. The stopping of both racism and the struggles of people everyday lies in the hands of each person who walks the earth. If this is true, then why hasn’t anyone done anything?
Another example of how society has not completely improved is by Non Government Organizations. Although many people may think NGO’s are helping society by putting money towards organizations that need the money to help people but what really happens is the organizers keep most of the portion of money or fail to provide a specific product as said, to the organization. Most people don’t think to do research about what their money is going towards and take part anyway. NGO’s goals are to create awareness and gain public support in hopes to receive grants or contracts from the government. Think about Toms for example, it is said that for every pair of shoes bought in stores, Toms will donate another pair of Toms to a child from another country in need. But how do we really know this is true? They claim to be a non –profit organization, but what if they are really just keeping the money for themselves and making millions doing it? There were likely many cases like this, trying to manipulate humans in history. This crime has been active for many years and is unfortunately still happening today. In reality Toms might be worth $5 dollars, but consumers continue to pay the $60 not just for the shoes, but also because they believe half of their money is going towards a child who needs it, in the form of another pair of shoes. This just goes to show how much of a profiting company Toms really is, they make all that extra money and then just keep it for themselves when they could be helping so much more by donating it all to Africa instead of just a cheap pair of canvas shoes which doesn’t help very much in the first place. There are many diseases that can be caught easily and Toms do not provide enough protection.
The Rwandan Genocide also is still an existing issue which killed one million people, mostly Tutis and some Hutu’s, continues to be one of the most tragic and memorable...