Mitchell V. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, 555 Nm P.2d 696 (1976)

1034 words - 5 pages

Unit 4
Introduction to Legal Analysis and Writing

Kaplan University
PA 205

Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, 555 NM P.2d 696 (1976)

Facts: This case was a reversed decision by District Court, Bernalillo County, awarding unemployment benefits to a discharged employee.  The denial of benefits was due to employee’s misconduct of insubordination, improper attire, name calling and other employee misconduct that disqualified the employee for unemployment benefits.
Issue: Did the employer’s action constitute misconduct under s 59-9-5(b), N.M.S.A.1953?
Rules: Was there misconduct by the plaintiff and was there cause for disqualification of benefits
under.
Analysis: ...view middle of the document...

2d 1316
(1976)
Fact: Billie Rodman was reprimanded on two occasions for receiving a large number of phone calls as well as personal visitors at her work station while on duty at Presbyterian Hospital.  The final incident happened on February 15, 1987 when she was terminated for leaving her work station twice on this date and receiving large number of phone calls.  She also left work on this date for 35 minutes without permission before returning to her work station.  However, when she did return the phone calls increased in number as the work shift proceeded.  The supervisor was frustrated with the volume of phone calls and it was determined she should be sent home.  Thereafter, she was terminated from her job.  The Appeals of the Department of Employment Security found that based on the evidence that Mrs. Mitchell proved that she was unwilling to restrict the phone calls or personal visits during work hours that had been set forth on her previous reprimand.
Rules: Was there misconduct by the plaintiff and was there cause for disqualification of benefits under M.M.S.A. 1978, Section 51-1-7(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law.
Analysis: After a third corrective action was Rodman terminated. Rodman was repeatedly reprimanded for her multiple phone calls and personal visits at her work station while on the job in June of 1986. Rodman was disruptive to her co workers.
Conclusion: The decision of the district was affirmed.
Analogizing and Distinguishing: The similarities of this case and my client case are they are both Unemployment compensation cases that involve misconduct at the work place but outside contact was brought into the workplace, even though they were phone call in this case but visits by friends and boyfriend is still a constant distraction interfering with work performance. The differences were the volume of work interruption did not subside in the case here and with my client they did.
Application to Client’s Facts: This client had no basis to be granted a claim for benefits.

It’s Burger Time, INC v. New Mexico Dept. Labor Employment Security Department,...

Other Essays Like Mitchell V. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, 555 Nm P.2d 696 (1976)

Business Law Essay

1488 words - 6 pages confidence commanding the utmost good faith. Swallows v. Laney, 102 N.M. 81, 83, 691 P.2d 874, 876 (1984). As a fiduciary, the real estate agent must reveal all facts within his or her knowledge to the principal that might affect the principal's decisions, rights, and interests. Id. A real estate broker or salesperson who breaches his or her agency fiduciary duty to a purchaser can be liable for damages. See Robison v. Katz, 94 N.M. 314, 321, 610

Field Research Paper

4160 words - 17 pages cases, Rivas v. United States, 368 F.2d 703 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied 386 U.S. 945, 87 S.Ct. 980, 17 L.Ed.2d 875 (1967) (holding before Montoya that “a clear indication” is between a mere chance and probable cause) and People v. Williams, 557 P.2d 399 (1976). Third, Montoya is not distinguishable because the defendant in Montoya was a traveler who had a diminished expectation of privacy when crossing the border. Furthermore, no one has a

Pharmacognostical Studies on the Root and Rhizome of Nymphoides Hydrophylla (Linn.) O. Kuntze –an Alternate Source for Tagara Drug

5773 words - 24 pages phytoconstituent having Rf 0.39 (Figure 2c) and alcohol extract revealed 3 phytoconstituents having Rf 0.37, 0.53, 0.65 (Figure 2d). At 425 nm, aqueous extract revealed 2 377 phytoconstituents having Rf 0.31, 0.42 (Figure 2e) and alcohol extract revealed 7 phytoconstituents having Rf 0.12, 0.15, 0.28, 0.37, 0.53, 0.68 and 0.75 (Figure 2f). The chromatograms of both aqueous and alcohol extracts were observed under 254 nm (Figure 3a, 3b), 366

World War 2 Weapons and Fighting Research

1022 words - 5 pages | |Bristol Beaufighter | |Boeing-Stearman PT-17 Kaydet | |Arado Ar.E.500 | |Bristol Beaufort | |Beech C-45 Expeditor | |Arado Ar.E.530 | |Bristol Blenheim | |Brewster F2A Buffalo | |Arado Ar.E.555 | |Curtiss P-36 Mohawk

The Good Samaritan

1183 words - 5 pages care from her Good Samaritan is what kept her alive. With this in mind it is quite ironical that her grandmother now “talks with passion about scrounging refugees; those asylum seekers who can’t even speak the language, storming the country and making it difficult for her and everyone else.” (p. 3 l. l. 116-118). This is a clear sign of what is going on in the head of the narrator, which is probably why “The Good Samaritan” is the chosen title

Potencial Flow Theory

2716 words - 11 pages { } (4.7) $ " { #! 1 + "V 2 + p + " gz = 0 . #t 2 #! 1 + "V 2 + p + " gz = c(t ) #t 2 } (4.8) UnsteadyBernoulli $ " (4.9) version 1.0 updated 9/22/2005 -4- ©2005 A. Techet 2.016 Hydrodynamics Reading #4 Summary Definition Continuity (! " V = 0 ) Irrotationality (! " V = 0 ) Potential V = "! " 2! = 0 Stream Function v V = " #! Automatically Satisfied v v v " # (" #! ) = " (" $! ) % " 2! = 0

• Messa (P) V. Sullivan & Keyman’s Club (D, a)

1756 words - 8 pages Title • Messa (P) v. Sullivan & Keyman’s club (D, A) Citation: what court or reporters • Court: Appellate Ct of IL, First District, First Division • Cited as: 61 Ill.App. 2s 386, 209 N.E. 2d 872 Author: judge • Judge Burman Facts: • P suffered injury at the Keyman’s Club bldg, Chicago: 1st and 2nd fl has many stores (bowling alley, barber shop, acocktail lounge, banquet and meeting rooms), 3rd fl for a labor union office, and

Oligopoly

2049 words - 9 pages THE PHIUPPINES ADMINISTRATION VISITORS PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES BOARD OF REGENTS MINISTER OF EDUCATION AND CULTURE, Chairman PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY, Vice-Chairman REGENT EMIL Q. JAVIER REGENT FLORENTINO B. HERRERA, JR. REGENT ESTELITO P. MENDOZA REGENT TOMAS S. FONACIER REGENT ORLANDO J. SACAY REGENT GERARDO P. SICAT REGENT AMB~OSIO F. TANGCO REGENT RONALDO B. ZAMORA THE UNIVERSITY EMANUEL V. SORIANO, B.S.M.E

Thermophilic Fungi

1870 words - 8 pages 280 nm under the assay conditions (Merheb et al., 2007). The experiments were performed in tripli-cate. Entrapment of the protease in calcium alginate beads The alginate immobilization procedure was adapted from Betigeri and Neau (2002). Predetermined quantities of sodium alginate (2, 2.5, 3, 3.5 % w/v) were prepared in 4 mL of 50 mM glycine buffer pH 9.0. To this solution 1 mL of crude protease was added and thoroughly mixed. The mixture was

Loose Change

963 words - 4 pages of a given item highly depends on who you are. Still, we see this disconcerting image of Laylor who takes on the (wrong) role as the compassionate Samaritan: “Is something wrong?” (p. 3, line 115) In text 2 “The Good Samaritan” the Samaritan is representing the narrator’s subconscious and what lies within it, because the subconscious cannot distinguish good from bad, it simply creates what it is told to do. The narrator knows what is morally

Natalie Attired

991 words - 4 pages Misty Owens PA 205 Professor Brian Craig Kaplan University Citation: Rodman v. New Mexico Employment Sec. Dept. 764 P.2d 1316 (N.M 1988) Facts: Employee was receiving numerous phone calls and visits periodically from her partner at her work place. This then escalated to a physical confrontation with the partner outside her work place in the lobby. She had been place on restrictions. So it was either her employee was going to fire her

Related Papers

Mitchell V Lovington Essay

733 words - 3 pages Mitchell v Lovington – Case Brief Melanie Brown Introduction to Legal Studies Robert Morse September 12, 2015 Citation: Mitchell v Lovington Good Samaritan Center, 555 N.M. P.2d 696 (1976) Brief Fact Summary. Mitchell (Appellee) was terminated by Lovington Good Samaritan Center (Appellant) for misconduct. Facts. Appellant terminated Appellee on the grounds of misconduct. Appellant alleges that the Appellee was

Case Briefs Essay

1511 words - 7 pages secondary sources, failure to provide any citation does not result in a deduction of 10% from the paper, but will result in a failed paper and a plagiarism investigation. | 10% | 8 | 8 | You did well in putting everything in your own words! | Total: 100% | [80] Possible Points | [65] Points Earned | ------------------------------------------------- Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, 555 P. 2d 696 (New Mexico, 1976)Facts:Zelma Mitchell

Pa205 Unit 9 Essay

1136 words - 5 pages Natalie Attired’s benefits because it was determined she was fired for misconduct. If a person is fired for misconduct they are ineligible for benefits under N.M. Stat. Ann. § 51-1-7(A)(2). There is no definition of misconduct in the statute. The question remains if Natalie Attired’s benefits constitute misconduct. Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc., 555 P.2d 696 (N.M. 1976) took the definition of misconduct from Boynton Cab Co. v

Case Brief Soldano V. O’daniels Court Of Appeals Of California March 28, 1983 Statement Of Facts A Patron Of Happy Jack’s Saloon Went Across The Street To The Circle Inn To Talk With The Owner Of The...

2048 words - 9 pages Dustin SOLDANO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Howard O'DANIELS, Defendant and Respondent. 141 Cal.App.3d 443, 190 Cal.Rptr. 310 Court of Appeal, Fifth District, California. (March 28, 1983) OPINION ANDREEN, Associate Justice. Does a business establishment incur liability for wrongful death if it denies use of its telephone to a good samaritan who explains an emergency situation occurring without and wishes to call the police? This appeal follows a