Plato Vs. The Arts
The philosopher Plato can be faulted as disliking the arts. When thinking of this well known philosopher one might consider his views on art to be intriguing. Plato as a philosopher takes things much further then the average person when viewing artwork. This could be that Plato questions the arts in many different aspects. He likes to go beyond and see the true meaning of where the end result might have formed from, as in the way someone might act on stage or a painting someone had created. He strongly believes the final finished product isnâ€™t really formed from ones own findings, but is merely just an imitation.
When it comes to the arts Plato strongly believes that it can alter ones personality. In Platoâ€™s account of the Ion he finds faults in the performing arts. He questions Ion about his performance on stage and when he responds that he went into a total state of madness. The question one might ask is how ...view middle of the document...
If a child plays a violent video game, they tend to pick up negative habits, such as bad language, or imitating the acts into real life. For example in my junior high school there was a group of boys who rein acted the popular video game known as Grand Theft Auto in which they went around vandalizing and hijacking cars of innocent town citizens. This left the town truly devastated and in total shock of what had happened and how video games could impact the minds of children. This being said it shows one that what we see could impact the way we think.
Plato also describes the arts as being a copy of a copy. This can be that an image that a person observes as someoneâ€™s end result of an art piece is really made up by two previous images. It would be as if a painting someone created was a copy of a photograph, which was itself a copy of the original. Plato strongly believes this because how else could someone form an image without having scene it in a past experience, as in seeing something in real life and then drawing it themselves and calling it authentic. An example that would go great with this theory is the painting of the Mona Lisa. One might question if the Mona Lisa is actually an original copy that was genuinely created him self. A question one might ask is if the image crated by Leonardo was actually a copy of someone that he might have known? For example even if itâ€™s not an actual person was the images such as the eyes, ears, mouth, or hair copied itself? If that is true how one could say that is simply not an original image. Leonardo could have merely just taken pieces of other peopleâ€™s faces and creating artwork from it. The painting for all we know might be of a personâ€™s certain features he liked in his everyday life. If this is so he took his best choices and contorted it in order to make his final masterpiece.
Plato as a philosopher one might say could be seen as a negative person for the arts. But then again someone like myself once in awhile might half to agree with him. Even though he questions the arts he simply is trying to state a point that is valid. Some people may not agree with this, but if you start to think about it even deeper it could truly start to make people to think about Platoâ€™s views.