This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Product Liability Cases Essay

1361 words - 6 pages

Colton Monroe
Bus Law Paper
Dr. Plumb

“Significant Product Liability Cases since 2005”

One area of Business Law that results in many significant lawsuits is product liability. Many significant product liability cases have occurred since 2005 at the federal level, and more commonly at the state level. Product Liability cases deal with manufacturers, suppliers, retailers, distributors, and others being responsible for the injuries that their products cause to customers (“product liability”). These cases, dealing with tangible personal property, can have major implications in lawsuits and can contain large amounts of damages. Many of these cases have placed certain ...view middle of the document...

Many consumers believe their injuries are because of the maker of the product, and the makers often attempt to find defenses for why they are not at fault. These cases involving the causation of injuries can be difficult to prove at times and can contain different opinions between juries and judges, resulting in many cases being appealed by the plaintiffs who believe manufacturers are at fault. I will discuss a few significant product liability cases arising at the federal level, which have been appealed up to one of the U.S. Courts of Appeals.
Kilpatrick v. Breg, Inc., Case No. 09-13813 (C.A. 11, Aug. 12, 2010), is a negligence and product liability case involving a pain pump manufactured by Breg, Inc. for use during and after surgery by plaintiff Douglas Kilpatrick. Kilpatrick had surgery on his shoulder in 2004 to repair his labrum, and to alleviate pain his surgeon put in a pain pump. Kilpatrick, a world class fishing guide, started to suffer from severe pain and popping of his shoulder during the 2006 fishing season. He was diagnosed with glenohumeral chondrolysis, which is a complete breakdown of the cartlidge, and learned from another orthopedic surgeon that he will need many future operations on his shoulder. The claim that Breg, Inc. was responsible for this injury was supposed to be backed up by an expert witness, Dr. Poehling, but his testimony was deemed unreliable. Without this testimony by Dr. Poehling, the court determined that Kilpatrick could not prove causation in his claim, so the court issued a summary judgment in favor of Breg, Inc. Kilpatrick appealed the exclusion of Dr. Poehling’s testimony, was the decision was upheld by the Court of Appeals (“Kilpatrick v. Breg, Inc.”).
Monroe 3
Malen v. MTD Products, Inc. is a case at the federal level that deals with strict liability. This case, Case No. 08-3855 (C.A. 7, Nov. 19 2010), deals with a man named Donald Malen who slipped while getting off his riding lawn mower and badly injured his foot on the rotating blade. He and his wife claimed that the lawn mower was defective in design and construction. The district court initially ruled that the plaintiff’s actions were the sole proximate cause of the injury, and the defendants were granted a summary judgment. The U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, under Judge Ann Williams, reversed the summary judgment granted to the defendants. This reversal occurred only last week, so the jury has not come to a verdict, but the judge believes the jury could find the defendants liable for a defective product that was the proximate cause for the injury to Mr. Malen. The product can be deemed defective because it did not have a mandatory safety interlock system called the Operator Presence Control device, which shuts off the engine if the operator rises from the seat without shutting off the blade. This defect will be used as evidence for this strict liability case and should hold MTD Products, Inc. liable...

Other Essays Like Product Liability Cases

Health Law Notes Essay

2463 words - 10 pages wrongdoers: applicable for gross negligence, cover ups, willful misconduct, and callous disregard. Cap $250,000 (in product liability there is no limit) 75% paid to treasury of state Directed Verdict:plantiff or defendeant has not made a case therefore rule in our favor. Discovery: depositions, interrogatories (list of questions limited to #’s) , production fo documents, mental and or physical examiniations. Discovery rule: medical

Finance Summary Essay

601 words - 3 pages , can provide a high level of control, equity and compensation. If selling is outsourced, firms hire independent contractors such as stockbrokers and insurance agents to reduce liability. If firms choose to have a combination of both insource and outsource, lines can be divided based on portfolio. Furthermore, firms can choose to offer all-­‐inclusive or limited to a select type of product

Law 575 Final Exam Latest Assignment

2298 words - 10 pages ? A. Intentional, negligent, and criminal B. Intentional, criminal, and strict-liability C. Intentional, negligent, and strict-liability D. Criminal, negligent, and strict-liability 9) Which of the following are commonly used theories of recovery in product liability cases? A. Negligence, negligence per se, and breach of warranty B. Strict product liability, negligence per se, and breach of warranty C. Breach of warranty, negligence, and

Corporate Compliance Plan

2971 words - 12 pages our experimental medical devices, the courts could go after the money generated by our profitable plastic bottle division. Therefore, it is essential that Riordan adheres to the highest quality standards for all of its products. Product liability means that if something we produce causes injury or death to its user, that person (or, in the case of death, his heirs) can take us to court and recover damages. In some cases, the court could even

Corporate Compliance

1843 words - 8 pages employee’s point of view. The final decision of the panel shall be recorded by the CCO as binding. IV. Enterprise and product liability There are liabilities that have been identified, including those under the enterprise umbrella. Enterprise liability is a legal principle that holds an entire organization responsible for the obligations or offences of its constituents. The responsible directors are expected to oversee all aspects

Internet Usage Torts

2961 words - 12 pages to provide a duty of care is proven and there is a breach of that duty, and other elements of this tort are proven. Even negligence and a wrongful death liability associated with Internet activity must be considered. (Could Craigslist be held accountable for the “Craigslist Murders?”?) 6. Product liability torts where product manufacturers, distributors and sellers of products sold are held responsible for the injuries caused by their

Frivolous Lawsuits

2726 words - 11 pages unnecessary liability. Both cases will be analyzed by comparing and contrasting the facts, law, and merit. In addition, this paper will examine ethical issues and address the topic of frivolous lawsuits as they apply to the two cases. Finally, this paper will argue ways in which each company could have used better risk management techniques to avoid the lawsuits. The Facts McDonald’s No matter the precaution one tries to take when handling

Healthcare Reform

5372 words - 22 pages still predominately court-created law but legislatures are playing an increasingly active role. One example of this is legislators placing limits on the amount of damages that can be awarded in certain types of court cases (Lipthrott 2005). Although state and federal statutes define some aspects of tort law, contemporary tort law remains defined by judicial decisions. Tort can be an excellent vehicle for viewing the nature of the common law, and for

Tort and Regulatory Risk

1504 words - 7 pages were not done with the intent to cause harm. Strict tort liability is a form of product liability” (p. 368, 369). The charge against Alumina Inc. is that carcinogenic discharge allegedly contaminated Lake Dira, contributed to a woman’s daughter Leukemia and she wants something done about it because treating Leukemia is expensive. This charge would be under strict tort liability because if this charge is true a federal regulation was broken

Negligent Torts

1427 words - 6 pages the community as well. The tort system has fostered excessive litigation that has retarded business growth and product development. Consumers have also been harmed because they ultimately bear the costs of coping with such a system through higher product and service costs. Risk managers can advance the need to establish national guidelines on the awarding of punitive damages and the elimination of joint liability for noneconomic damages. They

Business Strategy

1923 words - 8 pages Assignment 4: Products Liability Research Paper Strayer University AUGUSTINE WEEKLEY Law, Ethics & Corp. Governance March 15, 2013 1. Describe the company and the product safety issue that led to the lawsuit. Toyota Motor Corp.'s announced massive recalls for acceleration and braking problems are creating a huge legal liability for the company and Toyota owners may share in the pain. The Japanese automaker faces

Related Papers

Wk 2 Law 531 Knowledge Check

1661 words - 7 pages need to know in the content area. Rather it is a starting point for building your knowledge and skills. Additional study materials are recommended in each area below to help you master the material. Personalized Study Guide Results: Score: 11 / 12 Concepts | Mastery | Questions | Intentional torts | 100% | * 1 * 2 * 3 | Negligence | 100% | * 4 * 5 * 6 | Product liability and strict liability | 67% | * 7 * 8

The Risk Of Losing It All

963 words - 4 pages of the personal assets is high. The partners can be sued as a group or individually. In addition, the debtor can sue one partner individually, however he or she can seek a reimbursement of the paid debts from other partners (Seaquist, 2012). Even though one might think that partnership will help reduce personal liability during a lawsuit, nevertheless this may not be the case. In some cases, the amount demanded by the plaintiff may so high, that

Law Matrix Essay

2191 words - 9 pages will rely on the product itself. From design to development to sale, the product must be safe and reliable. Failure in this area could mean losses due to returned merchandise or parts and labor for repairs under warranty and extend to more serious matters such as lawsuits due to injured pets (Product liability cases and lawsuits, ¶ 2 ). Marketing is also a key issue with a great risk for liability issues. The marketing methods (more

Torts Of Law Essay

5108 words - 21 pages "pain and suffering" damages a softhearted jury may award a plaintiff. In the past eight years, the average jury award has tripled in medical malpractice cases. In product liability cases, it has quadrupled. That's why insurance companies try to settle out of court. The problems associated with malpractice awards came to the forefront in 2002 when a group of sixty specialists at the University Medical Center in Las Vegas refused to work