Real Relativism And Morality Essay

1067 words - 5 pages

Real Relativism and Morality
Jeff MacDougall
SOC 120
Instructor Tirizia Lorene York
February 25, 2013

Everything that Lenn Goodman argues makes a great point. Lenn Goodman sees the morality and lack of morality in the lives of different cultures, which is what makes this world a good and a bad place. Away for the sake of gaining respect or wealth, Goodman basically discusses that every person whether it be man, woman, or child has the rights to live and be free from any and all inhumane treatment.
Relativism is the idea that one’s beliefs and values are understood of one’s society culture or even one’s own individual values (Mosser, 2010). With that being said everyday a person ...view middle of the document...

(Matthew, 7:12, Standard Version). I believe this to be the best way to look at the situation on any of these issues.
Some Moral Minima, based on different sociology dissertations, morality has been an issue that many societies globally have been trying to contend. This term is used to describe the code of acceptable behaviors in given context or society. On the other hand moral minima is a word that goes hand in hand with mortality. This essentially sets a standard or rather a principle by which the members of a society have to adhere to so that they may be considered to be operating within the limits of proper moral conduct. The advent of civilization has given room to various forms that moral minima can be derived. As such, morality has become an issue that is interpreted in different ways depending on the angle at which one looks at it. Therefore, this has given rise to at least three areas where mortality is supposedly received or obtained. Morality can be considered relative to the laws of a given nation so that what the law stipulates as right then is morally upright. Morality is also be said to have also been derived from religion, where the various religion affiliations have their own holy books by which members are believed to behave in a certain manner. Finally, it is the personal source of morality. This is what has sparked a lot of controversy as is subject to millions of interpretation and understandings.
Consequently, this is what I believe triggered influential philosophers like Lenn Goodman to an argument that there are some things, which are certainly wrong. In Goodman’s argument, Goodman confirms the existence of four fundamental and universal things that fall under the category of wrong and unacceptable acts in society-moral minima. First is genocide that encompasses politically instigated famine and germ warfare. Second is the act of terrorism that also includes kidnapping and child labor force especially as warriors. The next category is polygamy, and that may also be extended to cover slavery and incest. Rape and female genital mutilation are also another...

Other Essays Like Real Relativism and Morality

What Is Right And Wrong? Essay

1060 words - 5 pages There have always been two sides to every issue. The right side, usually told by the first person to speak, and the wrong side, inferred irrationally by the opposed. In the article"Ethical Relativism: Who's to Judge What's Right and Wrong?" Louis Pojman addresses the belief that society dictates what is right and wrong. He provides three different theses on how morality is viewed and accepted. He categorizes these as "An Analysis of Relativism

In a Business Enviornment, Why Should People Be Moral as Individuals?

1106 words - 5 pages immorally. Moral relativism and moral absolutism both support the conclusions made herein. Moral relativism is the view that ethical standards, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and therefore subject to a person’s individual choice. (Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, 2014) Therefore, every individual’s morality is based on the experiences from their own life. Moral absolutism is the ethical belief that there are absolute

Biblical World View

649 words - 3 pages continuous process. Secular Humanist believes man is a result of naturally occurring chemical reactions that have occurred through the evolutionary process and that we have no particular purpose. Secular Humanist see mankind’s existence again as a result of the evolutionary process, mankind is just matter and has no more importance than any other living thing. Secular Humanism utilizes the Ethical relativism theory, where morality is relative to the norms

Universally Wrong

1092 words - 5 pages textbook relativism is “the view that one's beliefs are conditioned by one's culture, society and or community"(Mosser,2010). A person’s background and up bringing shapes the way that individual views morality. Goodman believes murder is wrong because ‘it destroys a human subject (Goodman 2010). I have to agree that Murder is wrong although there are a few ways to justify certain forms of murder. . Regardless of what you believe, no one has

Ethics: Right or Wrong

1025 words - 5 pages can use and striving for more, lays the burden on my shoulders to help those in need up. To pick up anyone who falls along the journey, all in the name of morality and humanity. “A Defense of Moral Relativism” by Ruth Benedict, examines morality. For Benedict, morality is cultural specific and not determined by outside influences. Her study of the Dobuan not sharing their food or yam seeds with their own family members is against everything

Biological Community

765 words - 4 pages divine (Stanford, 2004). | |Ethics |Ethics is at deals with morality. The main concern with ethic differentiating among good and evil in the world (Webster, 2010). | |Hedonism |Hedonism is the claim that only pain or pleasure can drive us (Stanford, 2004

Ethics and Emergencies

967 words - 4 pages , offers humans meaning only beyond this life. As such, it is an ethics of death. The social theory of ethics locates the value of human life in society or the collective. As such, it is an ethics of death for the individual. The "subjectivist theory of ethics" is really a negation of ethics. It can supply no real guidance for life, and is the ethics of death. Altruism, in whatever form, is the morality of the past. It has lead humans only toward death

Examine the Following Ideas as They Appear in the Theory of Situation Ethics: * Situation * Conscience * Relativism

598 words - 3 pages Examine the following ideas as they appear in the theory of Situation Ethics: * Situation * Conscience * Relativism First of all, Situation Ethics would produce a situation by setting aside all rules in a situation if love seems to be better served in doing so. Each situation is different and unique therefore reason is required make a moral decision, but only good lies with love. According to Fletcher, the Situationist follows a

English 102

3226 words - 13 pages disagreement. But, relativism also has a few points working against it: ➢ It can stop forward progress (e.g., understanding and change). ➢ It makes morality a matter of poll and/or consensus. ➢ It makes morality arbitrary. ➢ It conflicts with deep and widespread intuitions about morality (e.g., status of torturing innocent babies for fun). ➢ It conflicts with fact that we have a pluralistic society

Epistemology of Disagreement

2019 words - 9 pages gatherings of an evident difference turns out not to be in any genuine contradiction all things considered! This reaction is called relativism. As to the issue of religious contradiction, then, one could prevent the first preface from securing the contention and evade its suspicious outcomes. As per the relativist, when two individuals appear to differ over a vital religious case, for example, that "Jesus is the Son of God," the presence of

Ethical Subjectivism

884 words - 4 pages Ethical Subjectivism, also known as individual relativism, is the meta-ethical view that there are no objective truths in ethic; moral claims are true or false based upon individuals’ feelings. Ethical theory is a theory of what is right and wrong. This stance on ethics is the opposite of another ethical stance called meth ethical antirealism. Meth ethical antirealism is centered on the idea that because there is no right and wrong actions, just

Related Papers

Relativism And Morality Essay

1156 words - 5 pages Relativism and Morality: The Truth of Universal Morality SOC 120 Monica Jones August 13, 2012 Relativism and Morality: The Truth of Universal Morality Lenn Goodman explains in Some Moral Minima that there are many norms in terms of morals. Such subjects that Goodman mentions is slavery, polygamy, rape, incest, clitoridectomy, terrorism, hostages, child warriors, genocide, famine, and germ warfare. These topics send a shiver down the spine

Human Rights: Universalists Vs Culturalists Essay

1729 words - 7 pages based on culture. The basic conception in understanding morality is the observation that different cultures posses different set of moral values. That is, every culture has erected its own set of values, codes, or principles that it deems as being both true and correct. Most people think and would argue that there is such a thing as being right or wrong, true or false, but cultural relativism suggests that what we call true or right is really

Cultural Relativism Essay

942 words - 4 pages concept: cultural relativism. Cultural relativism holds the opinion that there is no universal morality that is common amongst all cultures. In an article written by James Rachels, an American philosopher, he breaks down the different challenges involved with cultural relativism, beginning with the list of general beliefs that cultural relativists can agree upon. They are: because different societies have different moral codes there is no objective

Ethical Relativism Essay

4021 words - 17 pages A. Shweder and the late Clifford Geertz have defended relativist positions in recent years. What is Ethical Relativism? Ethical relativism can be referred to the claim that morality is relative. According to moral or ethical relativism, there are a variety of possible moralities or moral frames of reference, and the deciding factor of rightness or wrongness of an action, good or bad, just or unjust, etc. is relative. In other words, the