Right To Counsel Essay

1598 words - 7 pages

Right to Counsel Article
According to Zalman (2011) from its origin in the Middle Ages until the nineteenth century English common law did not permit attorneys in jury trials. Before, criminal defendants had to represent themselves in English criminal trials, except in major treason trails in 1695, which defendants had the right to legal representation. Although lawyers could give advice to defendants, they were forbidden to speak in the trial. In 1836 English defendants gain the right to be represented by paid lawyers in felony trials. Colonial America embrace the idea of using an attorney in criminal trials. So the federal Bill of Rights and most states’ bill of rights guaranteed right ...view middle of the document...

Wainwright (1963).
Powell v. Alabama, also known as the Scottsboro Case, was a milestone Supreme Court opinion of 1932 that opened the gate for right to counsel. The case of 1931 involved nine African American teenagers getting arrested in Alabama for a fist fight with several White teenagers on a train after they were falsely accused of rape by two White female passengers. In a time in history when the tension of racism was high these young men were tried three times in southern Scottsboro, Alabama and each time sentenced to death. The Supreme Court seen this case twice and finally decided on the issue of the defendants due process rights to counsel had been violated.
The state argued that they did give the defendants counsel, and it did not violate their due process rights. After reading the transcript the Supreme court disagreed. Justice Southerland believed that the defendants were young, poor, in an unfamiliar city, and were not asked if they had access to legal representation. They were not given enough time to contact their families to arrange for counsel. It was also discovered in the transcript that none of the lawyers appointed to the case were willing to represent a specific defendant. The Supreme Court opinion of 1932 incorporated criminal procedure rights in the Bill of Rights, which included the guarantee of the assistance to counsel. The Scottsboro Case decision was based on facts and circumstances of the case, this did not mean that states had to appoint counsel for every indigent defendant for criminal trials. As a Due Process Clause precedent, Powell v. Alabama made it a requirement that defendants have a right to counsel in cases in which "special circumstances" exist (Zalman, 2011, p. 297).
The Supreme Court opinion of Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) finally set the tone for indigents having the right to counsel. Gideon was charged with breaking into a pool hall in the state of Florida. Appearing before the judge without money or representation, the defendant ask for legal representation by the state. He was denied counsel on the grounds that the state of Florida could only appoint counsel in cases of a capital offense. He told the court that he was entitled to a right to counsel under laws set by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Possessing only an eight grade education Gideon was forced to represent himself. He conducted his defense as well as he could. He made an opening statement, cross-examined witnesses, called witnesses of his own, he did not testify, and made closing arguments portraying his innocence. The jury found him guilty and sentenced him to a prison term of five years (The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College, 2013).
After Gideon's petition for a new trial because he believed his Constitutional rights were violated, was denied in the Florida Supreme Court he appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a prior Supreme Court opinion of Betts v. Brady (1942) held that it was not a violation...

Other Essays Like Right to Counsel

Simulation Worksheet Essay

1000 words - 4 pages right of people | | | |to express themselves freely outside of the workplace. | | |Step 2 |Who are the stakeholders? |Screen | |Be intelligent

Family Law Finial Assignment

631 words - 3 pages have lived separate and apart since January 1, 2003. 6. Neither party is dependent on the other party for spousal support, or each party is willing to waive the right to spousal support. Both parties understand that consulting with attorneys may help determine eligibility for spousal support. Both Plaintiff and Defendant waive any rights to maintenance. 7. Neither Plaintiff nor Defendant has any interest in real property. 8. The parties have

The Best Paper Ever

1060 words - 5 pages just to try and save their self for a harsher punishment. They may feel that there is not a good defense for the case, so they plead guilty. “Plea Bargaining and Convicting the Innocent: the Role of the Prosecutor, the Defense Counsel,” and the Judge written by F. Andrew Hessick III and Reshma M. Saujani, state that in reality the accused is giving up their right to a fair trial. The criminal justice system is based on a trail before a jury of peers

Throughout History Justice Is Not Always Served

4895 words - 20 pages adequate time and means for the preparation of a defense, the right of the accused to defend him or herself, or the right to a counsel chosen by the accused and the right to communicate privately with the counsel, the right not to incriminate oneself, the right to appeal at first instance to a higher court, but most of all a defendant must be entitled to an impartial judge and jury. Thus, if a judge’s interest in a trial is both personal and

Criminal Process

1307 words - 6 pages Criminal Justice Process 1 Criminal Justice Process Amber Parker Saint Leo University Criminal Justice Process 2 There are 16 processes in the Criminal Justices system. They are Intake ,First Appearance, Bail, Right To Counsel, Substance Abuse Evaluations, Pre-Indictment Events , Plea Bargains, Pretrial Intervention Program (P.T.I.), The

Downfalls of Capital Punishment

1449 words - 6 pages recipient of the death sentence. Foremost is in the handling of his own defense counsel. In the event that a defendant is without counsel, a lawyer will be provided. Attorneys appointed to represent indigent capital defendants frequently lack the qualities necessary to provide a competent defense and sometimes have exhibited such poor character that they have subsequently been disbarred.(Tabak 37). With payment caps or court

Adversary and Civil System

747 words - 3 pages of appeals reversed the conviction. On review, the court held that (1) a lawyer may not offer testimony of a witness which he knows is false, fraudulent, or perjured; (2) the defendant's continued representation by the attorney did not deprived the defendant of the right to effective assistance of counsel in that a refusal to call a particular witness because of an obedience to ethical standards, which prohibit the presentation of fabricated

The Supreme Courts Interpretations of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments; Miranda Warnings and the Exclusionary Rule

516 words - 3 pages anyone's house, even if they showed no criminal signs. They could then use any "dirty laundry" they found in a person's house and use it against them in court.The Miranda warnings are even more well known than the exclusionary rule. This interpretation of the Supreme Court is based on the Fifth Amendment. Basically, this amendment prohibits self-incrimination by suspects. The accused must be informed of their right to remain silent and to have a

Aluminum Maker

2215 words - 9 pages and doing the right thing for the company and the community where it operates. He understood the implications of a protracted legal battle and looked at the big picture when deciding to reach for mediation. As the legal counsel and an experienced litigator on environmental matters, Mr. Todd was focused on the evidence of the case and the fact he felt Alumina would be able to defend itself. Although Mr. Lloyd and Mr. Todd each had different

Biography on Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer

384 words - 2 pages Stephen G. Breyer was born into a Jewish, Democratic, and politically involved family in California August 8th, 1938. His mother was a member of the San Francisco Democratic Party and for the League of Women Voters, and his father was a lawyer and legal counsel for the San Francisco Board of Education. He attended Lowell High School in San Francisco and later was accepted by both Harvard and Stanford. He decided to go to Stanford, and later won

Due Process

1613 words - 7 pages accusation, counsel and self representation. The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution is a vital part of the U.S. Bill of Rights, which is sat in motion for the purpose of criminal prosecution. In the case of criminal prosecution, the accused will have the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state or city in which the crime or crimes where committed, which the city is ascertained by law and should be informed of

Related Papers

The Aspects Of Right To Counsel

1192 words - 5 pages he or she also has the right to defend him or herself (LexisNexis, 2012). When a person defends themselves it is called “pro per”. References: Criminal.lawyers.com/Criminal-Law-Basics/Criminal-Law-Procedure- http://voices.yahoo.com/the-right-counsel-5690106.html?cat=17 http://www.ehow.com/how_8510877_analyze-counsel-criminal-justice http://www.notguiltyadams.com/our-firm/practice-areas/criminal-law http://voices.yahoo.com/right-council-analysis-4992326.html Zalman, M. (2008). Criminal procedure: Constitution and society (5th). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Legal Counsel Essay

940 words - 4 pages , possessing a qualified lawyer represent the victim can make a variance, and have a better result. Conclusion A victim should hire legal counsel as soon as they have been victimized.  The citizens have the right to legal representation and should use it to protect themselves, their families, and assets.  By hiring counsel early in the negotiations the victim may have better chances of remedying the matter more quickly with not as many people involved

Miranda Rights Essay

609 words - 3 pages in the court. This gave his two new lawyers time to prepare for the case. The court saw that Miranda’s rights were violated and overturned his conviction. Miranda was not told that he had the right to remain silent and that anything you say may be held against you in the court of law. He was not told of the right to counsel and that if he could not afford one, one would be appointed to him prior to questioning if he desired. Miranda’s right

Business Simulation Alumina, Inc Essay

1807 words - 8 pages (EPA) on their spill even if it was five years ago. However, Alumina has a right to with hold any information that the company believes is confidential business information. The courts would decide what is confidential and what is not. According to Todd, Legal Counsel, he recommends to consider releasing portions of the environmental audit report that pertains exclusively to the EPA’s adjudication of Alumina’s violation. To prevent the