The Death Penalty Vs. Life Sentence

521 words - 3 pages

The Death Penalty vs. Life Sentence

Determining whether an individual should receive a death penalty or life sentence based on the crime he or she may have committed has been a major controversial debate in the United States and our Judicial System. Along with any possible solution to a problem, it will come with its pros and cons. It may have to do with the fact that costs of the death penalty including pre-trial and trial costs, appeals, and incarceration on death row has rapidly risen past 4 billion dollars since 1978 in California alone. Alongside the costs, many seem to believe that the death penalty can easily be a result of wrongful convictions in innocent people as well. These are just a few important factors ...view middle of the document...

The biggest argument supporting the death penalty is that it gives the victim’s family and friends a sense of closure. This entire process is primarily extensive and can be emotionally and financially draining for the victim’s close ones. As a result, the death penalty is a form of consolation for the life lost of their loved one.
On the contrary, the term “Life in Prison” briefly describes that the person convicted has to spend the rest of his entire life in jail, and depending on which state they are in, they may or may not be eligible for parole. For people in support of the life sentence rather than a death sentence argue that it is clearly more reasonable than executing a human being because the cost of fulfilling a death sentence is noticeably higher than serving a life sentence. In my own opinion, life imprisonment can without a doubt be as severe as the death sentence, if not greater. An individual serving a life sentence has to come to a realization that they now have to spend decades confined in a small cage-like cell within an environment where rape and violence occur on a day-to-day basis. With a death sentence ones troubles and worries are over with a single lethal injection.
In Conclusion, there really is no clear advantage or disadvantage for both the victim and defendant when deciding on whether the defendant should receive the death penalty or life imprisonment. Although the United States seems to be shifting more towards life imprisonment sentences, if we as a country wish to proceed toward a more humane society we must first learn how to make rational decisions without being easily influenced on pure prejudice and emotions.

Other Essays Like The Death Penalty vs. Life Sentence

The Death Penalty Essay

2028 words - 9 pages from the good in the world. It is a lot less cost efficient to just hold a person in a prison rather than execute them. For example, in North Carolina a study revealed the cost of a death penalty sentence was $216,000 and the cost per execution was $ 2.16 million more than what it would cost for life-imprisonment (WMJ, 2012). I believe more highly guarded prisons should be made, with the millions of dollars it cost for one execution, for

The Death Penalty Essay

719 words - 3 pages death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment and should be replaced by life in prison. The following reasons prove that the death penalty harms rather than helps any quest for a just, humane society. The Bible requires the death penalty for a wide variety of crimes, including sex before marriage, adultery, and homosexual behavior, doing work on Saturday and murder. Somehow people became more tolerant; they eliminated the death

The Death Penalty

2210 words - 9 pages or felonies. The crime that convicts a person to death varies from state to state. This is because the courts are state ruled or state governed. Not every state uses the death penalty; some find it morally wrong. Out of the fifty the states in America, thirty four states still use their power to determine the life or death of a human being. The states that do practice the death penalty argued that it is in play to prevent future murders. They

Juveniles And The Death Penalty

2094 words - 9 pages juveniles being tried for capital crimes, then the future of the punishment of these crimes will be life in prison without parole. With overcrowding and increasing costs to housing these juvenile offenders, this is not a sufficient alternative to capital punishment. Reform of the death penalty would mean a better solution and a speedy punishment for crimes committed which deserve this sentence. Some offenders don't deserve to have a lesser sentence that

Is the Death Penalty Needed

590 words - 3 pages Kevin Paris 10 September 2013 The death penalty was used as the ultimate punishment in the American courts, but is it necessary now? The death sentence is used when the offender killed another person with undisputed evidence. The death penalty was used more often during the early years of the United States as a way to scare others into not taking anothers life. Even with all the modern technology we have today the death penalty is

The Death Penalty Is Not the Answer

2350 words - 10 pages the old world the cries to stop the killing by the states were going from whispers to a loud roar (Riggio, 1995-2010). On Crimes and Punishment, published in English in 1767 by the Italian jurist Cesare Beccaria, whose exposition on abolishing capital punishment was the most influential of the time, had an especially strong impact. He theorized that there was no justification for the taking of life by the state. He said that the death penalty

Should the Death Penalty Be Introduced

991 words - 4 pages Should the death penalty be introduced? The issue of the death penalty is one of the most fiercely debated topics around the world. The issue is the source of many conflicts within many societies with some people arguing that it is the only justifiable punishment for certain crimes whereas others say that no one has the right to take the life of another human being regardless of their crimes. There are a number of countries around the globe

The Death Penalty Should Be Re-Introduced

963 words - 4 pages the bible advocates death for murder and other crimes like kidnapping and witchcraft. I will deal with both sides in broad later, but with my research so far and my knowledge of the earth and history and movies etc. the death penalty should exist in my opinion. It's bizarre to let people be able to kill and simply serve a jail sentence and thereafter can even be pardoned. Does it make sense? When most courts decided to remove the penalty, they

Retarded People Shouldn't Get The Death Penalty

1496 words - 6 pages retarded criminals will measurably advance the deterrent or the retributive purpose of the death penalty (www.cnn.com.2002/LAW/06/20/scotus.executions 1)."Now a defense attorney may request two experts to be allowed to look at their client and if they are recognized as mentally retarded then the judge is obligated to sentence life in prison instead of the death sentence. Some people disagree with this ruling, the most outspoken person is Gov. Rick

Pro Capital Punishment; The Death Penalty

1600 words - 7 pages death penalty, and up until 1980 only 2 executions. The number of murders grew as the number of executions with the death penalty shrank. A study by Stephen K. Layson at the University of North Carolina in 1985 showed that every execution of a murderer deters, on average 18 murders. It also showed that raising the number of death sentences would prevent 105 murders. But, only 38 percent of all murder cases result in a death sentence and of those

The Death Penalty: Justice, Safety, and Deterrence

915 words - 4 pages the criminal got what he deserved for killing their beloved. By giving justice to the victim, the death penalty can also provide respect to human life. Edward Koch once said, “It is by extracting the highest penalty for the taking of human life that we affirm the highest value of human life.” To respect human life, we have to execute those who had taken a life before them. Just like the old say, “an eye for an eye”, they have to pay for what

Related Papers

Death To The Death Penalty Essay

1008 words - 5 pages are dead so this statement proves to be true. However, execution is not the only way of preventing reoccurring murders. All we have to do is sentence offenders to a life in prison with no possibility of parole. Life sentencing with no possibility of parole accomplishes everything the death penalty accomplishes, and it is cheaper. A lot of people have a problem with spending tax dollars on feeding and housing murderers for the rest of their lives

The Death Penalty Essay 1673 Words

1673 words - 7 pages of a person by judicial process as a punishment for a crime. There are certain morals and effectiveness to having someone being punished in this manner; whether it is declaring a death sentence or execution itself, they are all still unjust. With that being said, the death penalty does not deter crime and should be abolished because it is totally inhumane, barbarous, and does not respect sanctity of life. The main reason the death penalty was

The Death Penalty Essay 1059 Words

1059 words - 5 pages penalty does definitely limit those who are executed. Life in prison without the possibility of parole is the alternative to execution presented by those that consider words to be equal to reality. Nothing prevents the people sentenced in this way from being paroled under later laws or later court rulings. Furthermore, nothing prevents them from escaping or killing again while in prison. After all, if they have already received the maximum sentence

Abolishing The Death Penalty Essay

2858 words - 12 pages . One is, if there is any doubt at all, as far as if a person committed the crime then you don’t use the death penalty. Two, all the new technology in America today should help in a murder case tremendously. One thing that surprised me while doing my research was the difference in the amount of money it costs regarding a death penalty sentence compared to sentencing a criminal to life in prison. My response to the cost of the death penalty is