Sarah Kate Powell
Health 2030- Section 002
19 November 2015
The Issues With Individuals In Society Having The Responsibility To Pay For Insurance That Covers The Cost of Contraceptives When It’s Against The Individual’s Personal Or Religious Beliefs
The term “ethics” can be derived from the Greek term ethos that means habit, custom, disposition or character. Ethics is defined as “a system of moral principals and a branch of philosophy which defines what is good for the individual and society. “ (Ethics, 2014) It is a collection of concepts acquired from philosophies, cultures, and religions. Some of these ethical concepts include the principals of ...view middle of the document...
This debate resulted in an action oriented health policy made up of a patchwork of federal laws, which explicitly allows doctors and other direct health care providers the ability to refuse in performing or assisting in an abortion. The issue surrounding abortion has now broadened to society and insurance, where deciding if individuals should have the responsibility to provide or fund insurance that covers the cost of contraceptives when it’s against the individual’s personal or religious beliefs. On both sides of the debate, individuals have valid arguments for why they support or for why they are against this policy; such as their ethical principals and the decision-making processes they apply to the issue. Policy dilemmas have arisen with this enacted health policy, however, due to issues with the uneven distribution in the rights and responsibilities of the stakeholders, along with differences in their moral decisions of what they feel is good or bad and their different perspectives in what is right and wrong (Ethics, 2014). Overall, this causes policy controversy, or an ethical debate.
One side of the healthcare argument poses the idea that is it ethical that individuals in society should not have to pay for insurance that covers the cost of contraceptives if its against their personal or religious beliefs. It comes back to the idea that any type of use of contraception is associated with abortion, which is against many individuals’ morals, beliefs, and values, is the opinion that is held by the key stakeholders on this side of the debate. These stakeholders would include individuals who are pro-life advocates and/or disagree with the performance of abortion, mostly the individuals paying for insurance that covers the cost of contraceptives when its against their personal beliefs. The solution that is most evident on this side of the debate is According to Medical News Today the term contraceptive means the use of any device, drug, agent, practice or procedure that prevents conception or impregnation. In 2013 a group of physicians in the American College Obstetricians and Gynecologist submitted facts to the Supreme Court that stated, “The medical groups’ brief describes the process of establishing a pregnancy, including ovulation (the release of an egg from the ovary), fertilization (the fusion of a viable egg with a viable sperm) and implantation (the implantation of a fertilized egg into the uterine lining). A contraceptive method, by definition, prevents pregnancy by interfering with ovulation, fertilization or implantation. Abortion ends an established pregnancy, after implantation.“ (Sonfield 2014)
With this evidence the autonomy of individuals on this side of the debate argue that they should have the choice to opt out of paying for insurance for especially religious leaders. The Little Sisters For The Poor have argued "the government has put them to the impossible choice of either violating the law or...