Universally Wrong Essay

1092 words - 5 pages

Dionne Harris
SOC120: Introduction to Ethics & Social Responsibility (ACG1318A)
Instructor: David Jung
May 13, 2013

The idea of what is moral has been a debated question for many years. With all the different cultures and beliefs in the world, there is no real understanding of what should be considered wrong as a whole. In the article “Some Moral Minima”, Lenn Goodman argues that there are a number of areas that he considers morally wrong for the universe. My belief is that there are areas such as murder, rape, terrorism and physical abuse that are just wrong period; however in certain circumstances those areas may be justified. In the article Goodman states ...view middle of the document...

Goodman also discusses Genocide. Genocide is type of murder that targets individuals as members of a group, seeking to destroy a race, a culture, a linguistic or ethnic identity, even a class (Goodman, 2010). This form of murder is just wrong period. After 911 many people began to become prejudice against Muslims because of al Qaeda. If someone decided to act on that hatred we could see genocide and, many innocent Muslims would die because of their faith. Sadly genocide was evident when some students at the columbine shooting were killed for being Christians.
Genocide coincides with another area I believe is wrong and that is terrorism. Goodman stated that terrorism is the act of willfully targeting non-combatants aiming to intimidate and attract attention (Goodman 2010). Terrorist groups such as al Qaeda will do anything including kill themselves for their cause. During the ongoing war in Iraq and Afghanistan we have seen many people killed to prove a point. There were many terrorist that captured tortured and even beheaded people to invoke a sense of control over another group of people. Terrorism does not always have to being international, there are many groups such as the kkk who terrorized and killed African Americans for years. No one who was born in this world got a say in their race so why does someone think they have the right to declare one race better. Children are being raised as terrorist simply because they can be easily programed. When children are little they are ignorant and if someone feeds you information your whole life eventually you will believe it to be true. Children are the product of their environment and many are being taught wrong, so they grow up believing and living that lifestyle.
Rape is wrong on all moral levels no matter what. According to Goodman rape is wrong and it not only violates another’s body but the other’s personhood and is invested in their sexuality. I agree whole heartily with Goodman because I was molested by my uncle at five years old. I can remember to this very day what I was wearing and every action that had taken place. After I was molested...

Other Essays Like Universally Wrong

Relativism and Morality Essay

1156 words - 5 pages connects our overall existence as a whole. Once our humanity is chipped away at by another we can see where the wrong doing lays. The preservation of life and the freedom to live life is what is most wrong to take away. Essentially a moral norm is things that our universal human morality should prevent that rob others of life, dignity, survival, and one’s own will. The targeting of one culture for mass murder is universally wrong for robs others

Whistle Blowing Essay

1708 words - 7 pages WHISTLE BLOWING Defination Whistle blowing is an attempt by an employee or former employer of an organization to disclose what she or he believes to be wrong doing sin or by the organization (James 1995) In Whistleblowing, raising concerns and speaking up are all phrases which describe disclosing information to an employer or where appropriate a regulator, police or the media about malpractice, wrongdoing or a risk to safety. Whistleblowing

Human Values as Common Ideals and Practical Rules of Behaviour

5601 words - 23 pages HUMAN VALUES AS COMMON IDEALS AND PRACTICAL RULES OF BEHAVIOUR 1) Print this Page      2) To translate page: use right click on this text - then 'Open page in new window' and select which languages for translationI accept that there are widespread (if not universally held and revered) 'common human values', which must include truth, peace-seeking, altruism, and not least also justice and human rights. To believe these to be immutable 'divine

Freedom over Loyalty

725 words - 3 pages One of the most known quotes given by William Shakespeare in the play Julius Caesar, “Et tu, Brute?” (Shakespeare 810) meaning “And you, Brutus?” universally represents the ultimate betrayal by one's closest friend. In the play, Brutus, a Senator and friend of Julius Caesar’s, joins a conspiracy to kill Caesar, in order to save the Republic as Caesar is soon to create a monarch which would destroy the government. Brutus’ loyalty to Caesar

Is Free University Education for All a Right or a Privilege?

912 words - 4 pages Is free university education for all a right or a privilege? In this essay I will look to understand both arguments for and against university education being a right or a privilege. A right is something that all people in the country have. Whereas a privilege is only for certain people usually people with a lot of money. What’s wrong with saying that higher education should be a right then? Isn’t that something everyone would agree on

Cultural Diversity

780 words - 4 pages position of racial equality. Television ads, billboards, magazines, and countless other advertising tools are used every day to ensure that equality is a universally promoted value and must be strived for in order to quell any turmoil relating to the issue. As long as this encouragement continues, looking at the next fifty years seems a little less bleak. If eyes stay open to the issues at hand, the year 2050 will hopefully make the year 2012 look

Google in China

790 words - 4 pages universally accessible and useful and do no evil. 2.) Can Google take the comfort from the reactions of stakeholders so far? In my opinion, it depends on the types of stakeholders. For competitors, such as Baidu, there is no doubt that Google exiting from China is great news by getting rid of such a strong competitor. And also I don’t think the shareholders of the company were happy to see that, as the stock price of Google falling as low as

Education Is a Right Not a Privelege

701 words - 3 pages increase tuition, it limits peoples’ chances to get the education they deserve. Education should be about expanding views and awareness and therefore it shouldn’t be structured. Restricting certain social/economic classes by only entitling the more economically eligible people with an education is a violation of the Declaration of Human Rights, written by the United Nations in 1948. This declaration has universally recognized education as a right

Speaking Out About Malt Case Study

764 words - 4 pages popular with inner-city teenagers. 40s have leaded to many teenage quick drinkers by whom 40s are called “liquid crack” and “date rape brew.” Some brewers don’t even put their company name on the label in order to avoid the indication of being manufactured by a respectable company. According to his categorical imperative, morally actions are defined as those can be made into a maxim that would be applied universally without contradictions

Video Games Helping the World

808 words - 4 pages . Many of the people that have done such things have even tried to use science to defend their Philosophies. One individual who has attempted to use science to defend his philosophical beliefs is Charles Darwin. He may have done this because he did not want to feel guilty when he did something that is ethically wrong, such as telling a lie. There is no legitimate evidence to support the theory that Charles Darwin formed. Scientists who do accept

English 102

3226 words - 13 pages that determine whether a given ethical statement is true or false. So, the statement “lying is wrong” is true just in case lying is in fact wrong. It is false just in case lying is in fact not wrong. Importantly, ethical theories can be divided into two general categories based on their answer to the question: is there moral truth? ➢ Ethical Absolutism claims that an act is right/wrong just in case it is right/wrong universally

Related Papers

Critically Evaluate Locke’s Argument Against Innate Ideas

1694 words - 7 pages is the argument then Locke must show that they are wrong to see this as the best explanation. This is something Locke never attempts to do. This problem with Locke’s attack is a symptom of a much greater problem; in the enquiry, Locke characterises those defending innate ideas in a particularly bad light. Locke seems to want to say that proponents of innate principles believe innate ideas to be universally assented to, that this universal assent

A Treatise Of Human Nature Essay

448 words - 2 pages . However we humans as children have a choice to kill or not kill them but the saplings don't. He then says that our sense of reasoning helps us differentiate between rights and wrong hence, vice or virtues can be only compared by perception of mind and not by qualities in object.As we know how that morals distinguish between moral good or evil, morality can be felt rather than judging. People, hence are influenced by their sentiments, so morality

In A Business Enviornment, Why Should People Be Moral As Individuals?

1106 words - 5 pages the building or the morally correct thing to do and the consequences of putting workers in this situation. A categorical imperative is that the owner new he was in the wrong and made the decision to do it anyway. A categorical imperative is a moral obligation or command that is unconditional and universally binding. (Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, 2014) An example of a categorical imperative is the bible, or the law; something that sates the

Human Rights: Universalists Vs Culturalists Essay

1729 words - 7 pages seeded in the Western liberal school of thought. Moreover, Charney argued that any talk about human rights is simply moot if it limits itself to “cultural particular” talk by suggesting that there is absolutely “no point in talking about fundamental human right at all” (Charney p845-847). The relativists believe that there is no such thing as an objective standard of right and wrong. But rather, what is right or wrong is